2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of sewage irrigation on safety and hygiene of forage crops and silage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
30
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Brudzinski and Harrison (1998) reported that E. coli cells might develop acid resistance following the induction of an acid tolerance response and, consequently, they would be able to survive at pH as low as 3.4. Contrary to our results, Weinberg et al (2004) reported that after 6 days of ensiling, the E. coli population reached the counts 8 × 10 3 cfu/g and after one month the number of E. coli decreased below the detectable level in maize silage. Under our conditions, a decrease in the counts of staphylococci was observed in the inoculated silage during the whole ensiling period; it is in agreement with the results reported by Faid et al (1994).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Brudzinski and Harrison (1998) reported that E. coli cells might develop acid resistance following the induction of an acid tolerance response and, consequently, they would be able to survive at pH as low as 3.4. Contrary to our results, Weinberg et al (2004) reported that after 6 days of ensiling, the E. coli population reached the counts 8 × 10 3 cfu/g and after one month the number of E. coli decreased below the detectable level in maize silage. Under our conditions, a decrease in the counts of staphylococci was observed in the inoculated silage during the whole ensiling period; it is in agreement with the results reported by Faid et al (1994).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…A previous study (17) revealed that the sewage-irrigated forage crops in Israel contain no or few E. coli and Salmonella. However, substantial numbers of E. coli have been found in on May 10, 2018 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ samples taken from commercial silages in which the pH was between 6 and 7, and these silages were considered spoiled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weinberg et al (17) showed that fresh forage crops which are irrigated by secondary-treated sewage water and well-preserved silages contain little or no E. coli. However, this species was detected in substantial numbers in decaying parts of silage (top and shoulders undergoing aerobic deterioration) and in feedstuffs in which the pH was above 5.0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) and good manufacturing practices (GMP) should be applied to forage crops and feeds (64). The cleaning of equipment would clearly reduce contamination, but another possible on-farm critical control point is to minimize the establishment of pathogenic E. coli in silage in order to limit E. coli contamination of animal feedstuffs, which can represent a first step in the human food chain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silages could be contaminated by several pathogenic microorganisms and more precisely by pathogenic E. coli through manure or irrigation water (64). Hazard analysis and critical control points (HACCP) and good manufacturing practices (GMP) should be applied to forage crops and feeds (64).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%