1978
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1978.tb01148.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of site of application on the performance of glyphosate on Agropyron repens and barban, benzoylprop‐ethyl and difenzoquat on Avena fatua

Abstract: Summary: Résumé: Zusammenfassung The effect of site of application was studied on the performance of barban, benzoylprop‐ethyl and difenzoquat agaínst Avena fatual, and of glyphosate against Agropyron repens (L,) Beauv. In all cases, performance was increased when the herbicide was applied towards the leaf or plant base. In general, treating the youngest, fully expanded leaf gave the best performance. Thus for plants at growth stages 12, 13 and 14 (Zadoks, Chang & Konzak, 1974) a greater reduction in foliage w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these experiments position of application did not significantly affect herbicide uptake and translocation. This is surprising in view of the results of Coupland, Taylor & Caseley (1978) and Merritt (1982), which showed that the activity of herbicides, including glyphosate, was greater when they were applied to the base of the adaxial leaf lamina than to the tip. It was suggested that this could be due to variation in the amount of epicuticular wax and the microclimate in different regions of the leaf, or simply a consequence of placing the chemical nearer to its site of action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In these experiments position of application did not significantly affect herbicide uptake and translocation. This is surprising in view of the results of Coupland, Taylor & Caseley (1978) and Merritt (1982), which showed that the activity of herbicides, including glyphosate, was greater when they were applied to the base of the adaxial leaf lamina than to the tip. It was suggested that this could be due to variation in the amount of epicuticular wax and the microclimate in different regions of the leaf, or simply a consequence of placing the chemical nearer to its site of action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similar applications to the inner leaf sheath have been shown to enhance the effect of several herbicides applied to Avena fatua compared to applications made to the expanded leaf blade. (Coupland, Taylor & Caseley, 1978;Caseley & Coupland, 1980). Compared to leaf blade treatments leaf sheath treatments resulted in much greater absorption and accumulation of herbicides in meristematic areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following amounts of 'rain' of up to 0.5 mm, loss of active ingredient and surfactant may be compensated by some redistribution of the remaining solution to more vulnerable areas of the plant. The retention data in Table 3 show that 0.16 mm of rain removed herbicide from the lamina, but that some was redeposited in the liguleheaf sheath area which is known to be particularly important with regard to herbicide performance (Walter & Bischof, 1976;Coupland, Taylor & Caseley, 1978). Coupland et al also found that re-wetting the treated plant increased the activity of difenzoquat and that herbicide applied in between the leaf sheath and the rest of the stem (analogous to the 'inner-sheath' position of this work) resulted in greater activity than application to other sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%