2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02910278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of spatial resolution on the accuracy of landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in Boun, Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
46
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies using remote sensing technology have explored the effects of spatial resolution (Irons et al, 1985;Turner et al, 1989;Benson and MacKenzie, 1995;Atkinson and Curran, 1995;Pax-Lenney and Woodcock, 1996;Qi and Wu, 1996;Schoorl et al, 2000;Chen et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2004;Claessens et al, 2005;Razak et al, 2011;Vander Jagt et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013) to analyze landscape pattern (Turner et al, 1989;Qi and Wu, 1996) and landslide-susceptibility mapping (Lee et al, 2004;Claessens et al, 2005;Razak et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2013). Although, there have been studies focused on the effects of spatial resolution for landslide susceptibility mapping, to our best knowledge, none have focused on small failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies using remote sensing technology have explored the effects of spatial resolution (Irons et al, 1985;Turner et al, 1989;Benson and MacKenzie, 1995;Atkinson and Curran, 1995;Pax-Lenney and Woodcock, 1996;Qi and Wu, 1996;Schoorl et al, 2000;Chen et al, 2004;Lee et al, 2004;Claessens et al, 2005;Razak et al, 2011;Vander Jagt et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2013) to analyze landscape pattern (Turner et al, 1989;Qi and Wu, 1996) and landslide-susceptibility mapping (Lee et al, 2004;Claessens et al, 2005;Razak et al, 2011;Wang et al, 2013). Although, there have been studies focused on the effects of spatial resolution for landslide susceptibility mapping, to our best knowledge, none have focused on small failures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the logical method is to reveal the landslide-responsible pixels. Lee et al [37] suggested that when the scale of the map was 1:5000-1:50,000, the 5 m, 10 m, and 30 m pixel sizes yield similar accuracy. In this study, a pixel size of 30 m × 30 m was adopted, and landslides larger than one cell size were used for the analyses.…”
Section: Conditional Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al (2004b) undertook a comparative study of landslide susceptibility assessments at different spatial resolutions: relationship between the landslide distribution and the predictive factors generated by DEM (constructed from a 1:5.000 scale topographic map) and vector data were evaluated with spatial resolutions of 5, 10, 30, 100 and 200 m. The authors determined that a 30 m pixel size was the maximum advised to obtain suitable predictive capacity. For this study, it was decided to use the best precision level of the available data (20 m) as the basic mapping unit.…”
Section: Landslide Predictive Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%