2008
DOI: 10.1185/030079908x292029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of statins on the development of new-onset type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
47
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of studies conducted after the Woscops showed inconsistent relationship between statin use and diabetes. 21,22 However, more recent analyzes corroborated the findings of the JUPITER study.…”
Section: Statins and Risk Of Type 2 Diabetessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Analysis of studies conducted after the Woscops showed inconsistent relationship between statin use and diabetes. 21,22 However, more recent analyzes corroborated the findings of the JUPITER study.…”
Section: Statins and Risk Of Type 2 Diabetessupporting
confidence: 69%
“…First, the diagnostic criteria of NODM were different between studies, with some including an initiation of pharmacotherapy and some including personal or a physician report [12][13][14]. Second, patients carrying a higher number of risk factors for DM are more susceptible to statin-induced NODM than those carrying a smaller number of risk factors for DM [42][43][44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in RCTs, the risk of NODM was reduced by 30% with pravastatin [9], was neutral with simvastatin [10], but was nonsignificantly increased by 15% with atorvastatin [11]. Against these backgrounds, several metaanalyses [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] have been conducted and have yielded possible evidence of a statin-DM association. However, such evidence -the increased likelihood of NODM in statin users than nonusers or in intensive rather than moderate dose users-does not indicate whether NODM is really harmful and consequently cancels any cardioprotective benefit of statin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Althoughstatinshavebeenproventobeeffective inreducingCVD,conflictingdataexistregardingthe effects of some statins on the risk of incident T2DM 91,141,142) .Interestingly,ameta-analysisofrandomized controlled trials suggested potential differences between individual statins, with pravastatin showingatrendtowardreducingmetabolicrisksand atorvastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin together being associated with a significantly increased risk of T2DM vs. a placebo 89) . More recent analyses have demonstrated an increased incidence of diabetes followingstatintreatment,regardlessofthestatintype 91,142) .…”
Section: Association Between Statin Treatment and The Progression Of mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statin therapy decreases cholesterol synthesis by inhibiting3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarylCoAreductase, whichsubsequentlyincreasestheactivityoftheLDL receptoranddecreasestheconcentrationofLDL-cholesterolintheplasma.Inmanylargetrials,treatment withstatinshasbeenshowntodecreasecardiovascular morbidity and mortality by reducing LDL [86][87][88][89][90] . In additiontotheirLDL-loweringactions,statinspossess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that may contribute to their cardioprotective effects [91][92][93] .…”
Section: Role Of Statins In the Redox System From A Cardiovascular Anmentioning
confidence: 99%