2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of substrate on the electroless nickel plating of Mg and Mg alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
55
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
5
55
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we found that the nucleation mechanism is also different. Apparently the traditional EN coating was preferentially nucleated on the b-phase or in the vicinity, resulting in non-uniform distribution [6,7,18]. On the contrary, the nucleation of the new EN processing is quite uniform on the PEO pre-treated surface from Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, we found that the nucleation mechanism is also different. Apparently the traditional EN coating was preferentially nucleated on the b-phase or in the vicinity, resulting in non-uniform distribution [6,7,18]. On the contrary, the nucleation of the new EN processing is quite uniform on the PEO pre-treated surface from Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The detailed operation conditions can be found elsewhere [16]. The conventional EN plating also was applied to AZ91 alloy, its detailed operation processes can be found elsewhere [7]. In order to compare the corrosion property of the two kinds of processes effectively, EN coatings with same thickness of 25 mm were plated onto AZ91 substrate after the two different pretreatments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was suggested that the kinetics of electroless nickel deposition on magnesium alloy substrates can be divided into three stages: first, an initial stage of approximately 0 to 10 minutes in which deposition is very slow; second, an acceleration period with an increasing deposition rate for up to 30 minutes of deposition; and third, a period in which the deposition rate starts to slow down again. [14] 2. Kinetics of EN-P deposition on magnesium alloy AZ31 coated with phosphate-permanganate conversion coating…”
Section: Effect Of Time On Thickness Of En-p Depositmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 However, acid pickling in a chromiumcontaining (VI) solution, followed by activation in a hydrofluoric acid solution is usually employed in the conventional pretreatment processes of direct ENP. [25][26][27][28][29][30] Several modified pretreatments have been devised to avoid the use of such process, which contains some species detrimental to the environment and harmful to human health. 11,[31][32][33] A method of avoiding the use of toxicant was carried out by employing a pre-plating step with an alkaline ENP bath prior to subsequent common ENP in an acidic bath.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%