2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3878(02)00079-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of survey attrition in longitudinal surveys: evidence from Peru, Côte d'Ivoire and Vietnam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
44
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this sample attrition rate is not low, it does not significantly bias the statistical estimation in the present study (see Appendix A). This is consistent with previous findings that sample attrition is not a major concern for longitudinal research (Alderman et al 2001;Falaris 2003;Fitzgerald, Gottschalk, and Moffitt 1998). The final analytical sample for this study includes 1,708 women and men.…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although this sample attrition rate is not low, it does not significantly bias the statistical estimation in the present study (see Appendix A). This is consistent with previous findings that sample attrition is not a major concern for longitudinal research (Alderman et al 2001;Falaris 2003;Fitzgerald, Gottschalk, and Moffitt 1998). The final analytical sample for this study includes 1,708 women and men.…”
Section: Datasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Moreover, we employ an estimation strategies which can resolve many potential biases (including attrition bias) that are due to unobservables. 8 Studies that use longitudinal data from both developed (see Journal of Human Resources 1998 Spring issue) and developing countries (Thomas, Frankenberg and Smith (2001) for IFLS data; Falaris (2003) for LSMS data from Peru, Cote d'Ivoire and Vietnam) …nd that even if demographic variables for attritors and stayers are di¤erent, and there are selective mechanisms working for attrition, the e¤ects of attrition on parameter estimates are mild or non-existent. 9 We also experiment with the most common approach of taking account of attrition bias in our regression estimation.…”
Section: Attritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to human capital, we use the average of schooling years of all adult household members. 13 We consider this to better reflect the stock of human capital of households than education of the household head only, as many heads are relatively old. We control for the hours per week worked in services per employed household member.…”
Section: (Total Difference = Characteristics Effect + Coefficients Efmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We report the results separately for 13 Years of education were inferred from the level of education obtained. We take the schooling reform of 1989 into consideration, as this increased primary and secondary schooling to last 11 years, up one year from the previous ten.…”
Section: (Total Difference = Characteristics Effect + Coefficients Efmentioning
confidence: 99%