2019
DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.12526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the 2009 WIC food package change on childhood obesity varies by gender and initial weight status in Los Angeles County

Abstract: Objective: To assess whether the effect of the 2009 women, infants, and children (WIC) food package change on obesity outcomes varies by initial weight status and gender.Methods: Using 2003 to 2016 data from Los Angeles County, we compared growth trajectories and obesity at age 4 years among children exposed to WIC after the food package change (n = 53 075) vs children exposed before (n = 53 075). Analyses were stratified by gender and initial weight status: low weight-for-height z-score (WHZ ≤ 25th percentile… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Frequencies, means and SD were used to characterize participants. Because sex differences were reported previously, 16 22 sex-stratified analyses were conducted. WHZ growth trajectories were modelled using piecewise linear spline mixed models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequencies, means and SD were used to characterize participants. Because sex differences were reported previously, 16 22 sex-stratified analyses were conducted. WHZ growth trajectories were modelled using piecewise linear spline mixed models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forty-four studies assessed the association between the 2009 WIC food package revisions and availability of foods and beverages in supermarkets; purchases, redemptions, or dietary intake among WIC participants; obesity in early childhood; perinatal and birth outcomes; or outcomes related to breastfeeding [ 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 , 145 , 146 , 147 , 148 , 149 , 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 ]. There is consistent evidence of an association between the WIC food package revisions and improvements in household food purchases and dietary intake among both adults and children [ 111 , 114 , 115 , 116 ...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impacts of the revisions on breastfeeding are mixed, with some studies showing increases in breastfeeding initiation [ 129 , 153 ], others showing no effect [ 118 ], and none finding a relationship with breastfeeding at six months [ 129 , 153 ]. Recent research using interrupted time series or controlled quasi-experimental designs show improvements in maternal and child health outcomes resulting from the food package changes, including reductions in infant and young child obesity [ 125 , 126 , 127 , 130 ], improvements in infant birth weight outcomes (low birth weight, small for gestational age, and large for gestational age) [ 120 ], and reductions in maternal weight gain and preeclampsia [ 120 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…neighborhoods with high density of unhealthy food outlets) may be needed. Gender differences in the associations between the 2009 WIC food package change and childhood obesity have been reported previously [17,42], and more detailed research may be needed to evaluate why benefits of the food package changes seem to have been more consistent for boys than for girls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%