2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of the Ca2+ to activity ratio on spiral growth at the calcite surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
122
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
10
122
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4a, providing Fig 4b. This is consistent with the observation, previously reported in the literature for calcite growth, that the calcite step velocities and, more generally, the calcite growth rate decrease as the calcium-to-carbonate ratio increases (Nehrke et al, 2007;Larsen et al, 2010;Stack and Grantham, 2010;Bracco et al, 2012;Gebrehiwet et al, 2012). Additionally, the growth of 2D nuclei takes place at [Cd 2+ ] 0 P 0.025 mM (Fig.…”
Section: Growth Kinetics As a Function Of [Cd 2+ ]supporting
confidence: 93%
“…4a, providing Fig 4b. This is consistent with the observation, previously reported in the literature for calcite growth, that the calcite step velocities and, more generally, the calcite growth rate decrease as the calcium-to-carbonate ratio increases (Nehrke et al, 2007;Larsen et al, 2010;Stack and Grantham, 2010;Bracco et al, 2012;Gebrehiwet et al, 2012). Additionally, the growth of 2D nuclei takes place at [Cd 2+ ] 0 P 0.025 mM (Fig.…”
Section: Growth Kinetics As a Function Of [Cd 2+ ]supporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, there are important differences among cations and anions that must be considered before extending the same conclusions to either oxygen or carbon isotope effects in calcite. In particular, Larsen et al (2010) proposed that the rate of Ca 2+ ion attachment to kink sites is likely limited by the rate of calcium desolvation, while the rate of carbonate ion attachment may be limited by the rate of calcium kink site dehydration. The dehydration frequency for Ca 2+ is about 10 8.2 s −1 whereas the dehydration frequency for CO 2− 3 is estimated to be in the range of 10 9 -10 10 s −1 (Nielsen, 1984).…”
Section: Interpretation Of Kinetic Fractionation Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the isotope fractionation model and its application to trace element partitioning described below. It is also noteworthy that recent studies have shown that k à f is dependent on the Ca 2+ /CO 3 2À ratio of the solution (Nehrke et al, 2007;Larsen et al, 2010), which is important for evaluating how the exchange flux R b relates to k à f .…”
Section: Equations For Surface Reaction Control Of Caco 3 Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%