2013
DOI: 10.5539/ijef.v5n5p64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of the Domestic Debt on the Financial Development: A Case Study for Turkey

Abstract: The aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between domestic public debt and financial development for the Turkish economy between 2002Q1-2012Q2. The previous panel data studies for developing countries suggest two main approaches. One view asserts a positive relationship between them while the other view asserts a negative relationship. Our results which are based on time-series analysis support the second view which advocates the negative relationship between domestic indebtedness and financial d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The short-run association between public domestic debt and financial development is inelastic and significant, indicating that financial development variation is less responsive to public domestic debt changes. These results agree with Altaylıgil et al, (2013), who asserted that reducing public domestic debt allowed the financial sector to advance more to the private sector, which catalyses financial development. This result further confirms the Hauner (2006) lazy bank hypothesis, which asserted that financial institutions' excessive public debt held by financial institutions renders the institutions comfortable with the easy profits and reduces competition over clients hampering financial expansion.…”
Section: Hypothesis Testing Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The short-run association between public domestic debt and financial development is inelastic and significant, indicating that financial development variation is less responsive to public domestic debt changes. These results agree with Altaylıgil et al, (2013), who asserted that reducing public domestic debt allowed the financial sector to advance more to the private sector, which catalyses financial development. This result further confirms the Hauner (2006) lazy bank hypothesis, which asserted that financial institutions' excessive public debt held by financial institutions renders the institutions comfortable with the easy profits and reduces competition over clients hampering financial expansion.…”
Section: Hypothesis Testing Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…An elasticity coefficient of 0.3514 existing between public domestic debt and financial development suggests that a 1% growth in public domestic debt leads to a 0.3514% decrease in Kenya's financial development in the longrun. This result agrees with Altaylıgil et al (2013), which asserted that decreasing public borrowing allows the private sector to advance more to private investors, hence fostering financial development. The results contradict Mogaka (2017), which affirms that public sector borrowing positively correlates with financial development.…”
Section: Lnfdt=β0+β1lnpddt+ β2lnpedt+ β3lnintt+µt (6)supporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The extended Endogenous Growth Theory captures the threshold relationship between fiscal deficit and economic growth (Slimani, 2016). According to the theory, government plays a significant role through wellselected productive investments like promoting the accumulation of knowledge, research and development, real public investment, human capital development and law and order, which can generate growth both in the short-and longrun (Altayligil & Akkay, 2013). The model emphasises an explicit link between government spending and long-run economic growth in endogenous growth and shows the process of determining optimal public expenditure.…”
Section: Theoretical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many developing countries, the weight of domestic debt in total public debt has increased considerably, for some countries due to difficulties in accessing financing in international markets (mainly due to the decrease in multilateral and concessional loans), and for others due to the simple strategy of governments to reduce external dependency (Panizza 2008). Although reducing macroeconomic risks, the rapid increase in the share of domestic credit absorbed by the public sector in many developing countries (such as Cape Verde) raises questions about the consequences for the development of the financial sector (Panizza 2008;Hauner 2009) such as conceding inefficient credit to the private sector and precarious financial development (Altayligil and Akkay 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%