1957
DOI: 10.2307/3570566
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of the Host on Ultraviolet Inactivation and Photoreactivation of a Bacterial Virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One point which is difficult to explain is that recognition of the PF sometimes differed among different cells [7,12,14,15,19,26,32]. Data at hand indicate that the PF of herpes virus requires a longer time for complete adsorption and penetration than native virus, similar to that observed in the case of poliovirus [17].…”
Section: Proof For the Presence Of Non-aggregate Unneutralizable Virusmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…One point which is difficult to explain is that recognition of the PF sometimes differed among different cells [7,12,14,15,19,26,32]. Data at hand indicate that the PF of herpes virus requires a longer time for complete adsorption and penetration than native virus, similar to that observed in the case of poliovirus [17].…”
Section: Proof For the Presence Of Non-aggregate Unneutralizable Virusmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…I t is reported t o be shortest a t the optimum temperature and nutrition of the host (6,7). Data on percentage adsorption and burst size fluctuate sonlewhat despite carefully conducted experiments (1,8).…”
Section: Growth Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%