2008
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/17/5/055018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of time synchronization of wireless sensors on the modal analysis of structures

Abstract: Driven by the need to reduce the installation cost and maintenance cost of structural health monitoring (SHM) systems, wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are becoming increasingly popular. Perfect time synchronization amongst the wireless sensors is a key factor enabling the use of low-cost, low-power WSNs for structural health monitoring applications based on output-only modal analysis of structures. In this paper we present a theoretical framework for analysis of the impact created by time delays in the measure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
69
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A small synchronization error between devices means that obtaining the proper mode shapes without deviating from reality or theoretical calculations of structure is not possible. Without this fundamental feature, the use of WN is not feasible because its error would exceed the noise made by the sensors [2], [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small synchronization error between devices means that obtaining the proper mode shapes without deviating from reality or theoretical calculations of structure is not possible. Without this fundamental feature, the use of WN is not feasible because its error would exceed the noise made by the sensors [2], [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that this requirement can be easily met in the traditional wired sensing system but not in case of WSNs with inherent synchronization errors. Nagayama et al (2007) noted substantial effects of initial DSE on modal phases detected from simulation model by one parametric OMA method, whereas Krishnamurthy et al (2008) observed considerable influence of initial DSE on mode shape magnitudes estimated by FDD in an experiment. Yan and Dyke (2010) confirmed effects of DSE on mode shapes in both simulation and experimental studies.…”
Section: Major Uncertainties Of Shm-oriented Wsnsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Table 1) and of 0.01 on the MAC. -A potential lack of synchronization between the recordings of the accelerometers is accounted for with an uncertainty of 0.2% on the MAC [10]. -The secondary parameters that have a relative importance below five percent (i.e.…”
Section: Continuous Beam Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%