The effect of Triphala and Chlorhexidine mouthwash on dental plaque, gingival inflammation, and microbial growth

Abstract

The objective of this study was to ascertain the effects of a mouthwash prepared with Triphala on dental plaque, gingival inflammation, and microbial growth and compare it with commercially available Chlorhexidine mouthwash. This study was conducted after ethics committee approval and written consent from guardians (and assent from the children) were obtained. A total of 1431 students in the age group 8–12 years, belonging to classes fourth to seventh, were the subjects for this study. The Knowledge, Attitude and Practice (KAP) of the subjects was determined using a questionnaire. The students were divided into three groups namely, Group I (n = 457) using Triphala mouthwash (0.6%), Group II (n = 440) using Chlorhexidine mouthwash (0.1%) (positive control), and Group III (n = 412) using distilled water (negative control). The assessment was carried out on the basis of plaque scores, gingival scores, and the microbiological analysis (Streptococcus and lactobacilli counts). Statistical analysis for plaque and gingival scores was conducted using the paired sample t-test (for intragroup) and the Tukey's test (for intergroup conducted along with analysis of variance test). For the Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus counts, Wilcoxon and Mann–Whitney test were applied for intragroup and intergroup comparison, respectively. All the tests were carried out using the SPSS software. Both the Group I and Group II showed progressive decrease in plaque scores from baseline to the end of 9 months; however, for Group III increase in plaque scores from the baseline to the end of 9 months was noted. Both Group I and Group II showed similar effect on gingival health. There was inhibitory effect on microbial counts except Lactobacillus where Triphala had shown better results than Chlorhexidine. It was concluded that there was no significant difference between the Triphala and the Chlorhexidine mouthwash.

Anti Cariogenic Effect of Terminalia Chebula

“…chebula (aqueous extract) strongly inhibited the microbial growth, sucrose induced adherence and glucan induced aggregation of S.mutans. Mouth rinsing with a 10% solution of the extract inhibited microbial count [27]. T. chebula demonstrated preventive action on dental caries has shown that owning to the microbial reduction may be attributed to the presence of tannins and flavonoid [28].…”

Healthy Lifestyle For Healthy Gums

“…Thus, it can be used as an adjunct to mechanical therapy for treating plaque induced gingivitis [75,76]. Patel and Ventakrishna reported a significant reduction in probing depth and gain in clinical attachment level by its use [77]. 0.6% triphala mouth wash has been reported to reduce plaque scores, improve gingival health and have an inhibitory effect on bacterial count [77].…”

“…Patel and Ventakrishna reported a significant reduction in probing depth and gain in clinical attachment level by its use [77]. 0.6% triphala mouth wash has been reported to reduce plaque scores, improve gingival health and have an inhibitory effect on bacterial count [77]. Triphla is Composed of the fruits of three trees, Indian gooseberry Amalaki (Embilica officinalis), Bibhitaki (Terminalia beleria), and Haritaki (Terminalia chebula), and is mentioned throughout the ancient literature of Ayurvedic medicine as a tonic, highly prized for its ability to regulate the process of digestion and elimination.…”

Antibacterial Effect of Aqueous Extracts and Bioactive Chemical Compounds of <i>Coffea canephora</i> against Microorganisms Involved in Dental Caries and Periodontal Disease

“…The foremost chemical agents currently available are chlorhexidine, triclosan, cetylpyridinium chloride, and natural products [10] [11]. In this respect, natural products have been proposed in attempt to minimize undesirable effects caused by synthetic agents such as imbalance of the resident microbiota, and altered taste, besides representing a new antimicrobial possibility that might be used to face a situation of microbial resistance [12].…”