2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11113-012-9230-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Urbanization on China’s Fertility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, some individual and household characteristics may explain fertility intentions, such as the changing marriage rate, the average age at marriage (Feeney & Wang, 1993), cohabitation and separation (Kohler, Billari, & Ortega, 2002), contraceptive practice (Goldstein, Sobotka, & Jasilioniene, 2009), the role of women's socioeconomic characteristics including labour market engagement (Engelhardt, Kögel, & Prskawetz, 2004) and educational engagement and attainment (Hoem, Neyer, & Andersson, 2006), as well as ideational shifts that influence attitudes towards gender roles and childbearing (Kulu & Boyle, 2009). Second, it has also been recognized that fertility intentions are influenced by institutional structures and policies (Aassve, Burgess, Propper, & Dickson, 2006), such as the national fertility policy (Feyisetan & Casterline, 2000;Wang, Zhang, & Wu, 2016), urbanization, and socioeconomic development (Guo, Wu, Schimmele, & Li, 2012). In the Chinese context, we identify the following socioeconomic factors that may be particularly relevant to the fertility intentions of the floating population.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Correlates Of Fertility Intentions Among Chimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, some individual and household characteristics may explain fertility intentions, such as the changing marriage rate, the average age at marriage (Feeney & Wang, 1993), cohabitation and separation (Kohler, Billari, & Ortega, 2002), contraceptive practice (Goldstein, Sobotka, & Jasilioniene, 2009), the role of women's socioeconomic characteristics including labour market engagement (Engelhardt, Kögel, & Prskawetz, 2004) and educational engagement and attainment (Hoem, Neyer, & Andersson, 2006), as well as ideational shifts that influence attitudes towards gender roles and childbearing (Kulu & Boyle, 2009). Second, it has also been recognized that fertility intentions are influenced by institutional structures and policies (Aassve, Burgess, Propper, & Dickson, 2006), such as the national fertility policy (Feyisetan & Casterline, 2000;Wang, Zhang, & Wu, 2016), urbanization, and socioeconomic development (Guo, Wu, Schimmele, & Li, 2012). In the Chinese context, we identify the following socioeconomic factors that may be particularly relevant to the fertility intentions of the floating population.…”
Section: Socioeconomic Correlates Of Fertility Intentions Among Chimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One fundamental factor highlighted in the literature is the inverse relationship between urbanization and fertility (Guo et al 2012;Kulu 2013). This relationship is seen in Figure 1 in county level data from China's 2010 Population Census, where the urban population is in terms of those living in urban areas in the left panel and those with urban hukou in the right panel.…”
Section: Background and Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The time-series data show the same inverse relationship; from 1970 to 2014, the share of the urban population increased from about one-sixth to one-half and the TFR fell from 5.7 to 1.5 (World Bank 2016). Moreover, urbanization is forecast to be the main factor behind China's future fertility decline (Guo et al 2012).…”
Section: Background and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though urbanization and migration to the city have been consistently linked to fertility decline (Goldstein, White, & Goldstein, ; Guo, Wu, Schimmele, & Li, ; Mason, ), the density and diversity of cities of the developing world bring along diverse reproductive strategies that generate a wide range of fertility levels (Montgomery, ). Studies of intra‐urban fertility have discovered pockets of above average fertility levels within the city comparable to those of rural areas (Weeks, Getis, Hill, Agyei‐Mensah, & Rain, ), and divergences resulting from changes in reproductive behavior taking place at specific age groups (Weeks et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%