The effect of varying danger controllability on attention to threat messages

Abstract

Summary The objective of this study is to determine whether attention toward fear messages is affected by variation in the controllability of the associated danger. There is no consensus regarding the effectiveness of fear appeals in driving adaptive behaviour, and it may be the case that threat messages fail to capture attention if the associated danger is not explicitly controllable. One hundred and sixty undergraduate university students completed a computer task that involved exposure to threat cues signalling a danger (money loss). In high control blocks, attending to threat cues provided a high chance of avoiding the danger, whereas in low control blocks, attending to threat cues provided little chance of avoiding the danger. Attentional capture by threat was measured. A mixed‐design analysis of variance showed there was greater attentional capture by threat cues in high control blocks compared with low control blocks. This effect was observed with a short stimulus exposure duration and was magnified with a long exposure duration. Fear appeals could capture attention to a greater degree if the danger related to the threat message was communicated as being controllable. This has significant practical implications for the implementation of fear appeals.

Towards Healthy Adolescents: A Review of Smoking Impact According to Dental Perspectives

“…Furthermore, a previous study found that smokers have a one-decade shorter life expectancy compared to nonsmokers (16), emphasising the need of raising knowledge about the impact of smoking among adolescents, thus smoking-related morbidity and mortality might be avoided at a younger age. In line with the previous finding which reports that knowing the negative impacts of the behaviour will prevent a person from continuing the behaviour (17,18) and it applies to smoking behaviour.…”

The relationship between worry and attentional bias to threat cues signalling controllable and uncontrollable dangers

“…This pattern of attention allocation is referred to as attentional bias alignment [ 31 ]. Several studies have now demonstrated that individuals in general indeed flexibly align their attentional bias to such variation in danger controllability, to show a greater attentional bias to threats signalling more controllable dangers relative to threats signalling less controllable dangers [ 31 , 34 ]. In the current study, we propose that a decreased ability to show such attentional bias alignment contributes to experiencing disruptive worry in particular.…”