2017
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20151589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of Wealth on Individual and Household Labor Supply: Evidence from Swedish Lotteries

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

24
148
4
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
24
148
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…of other contexts. 12 In terms of nomenclature, some papers in this lottery-winner literature refer to lottery wins as income shocks (e.g., Kuhn et al, 2011), while others refer to lottery wins as wealth shocks (e.g., Cesarini, Lindqvist, Notowidigdo, and Ostling, 2017). In this paper, while we use the term income shocks for a lottery win, it would also be possible to use the term wealth shocks, given that a lottery win can be considered either a wealth shock or an income shock.…”
Section: Contribution To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…of other contexts. 12 In terms of nomenclature, some papers in this lottery-winner literature refer to lottery wins as income shocks (e.g., Kuhn et al, 2011), while others refer to lottery wins as wealth shocks (e.g., Cesarini, Lindqvist, Notowidigdo, and Ostling, 2017). In this paper, while we use the term income shocks for a lottery win, it would also be possible to use the term wealth shocks, given that a lottery win can be considered either a wealth shock or an income shock.…”
Section: Contribution To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Work and retirement decisions. Previous literature has identified a number of factors that influence work and retirement decisions, including job loss (Chan and Stevens 2004), health insurance (Johnson et al 2003;French and Jones 2011), out-of-pocket health care costs (Johnson et al 2008), housing wealth (Begley and Chan 2018;Ondrich and Falevich 2016), stock market performance (Goda et al 2012), inheritances (Brown et al 2010), and lottery winnings (Cesarini et al 2017). Using the Health and Retirement Study (HRS), Begley and Chan (2018) find that older men who experience moderately negative shocks to their home values respond by delaying their retirement and their receipt of social security, and in some cases, if already retired, by reversing their retirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mientras que en la provincia de Manitoba (Canadá) se implementó un experimento de impuestos negativos sobre la renta y no se encontraron efectos estadísticamente significativos en la oferta de trabajo (Hum y Simpson, 1993) 17 18 . Por último, Cesarini et al (2017) encuentra que ganar un premio de lotería reduce muy modestamente la oferta de trabajo. En conclusión, a grandes rasgos, los resultados obtenidos de las evaluaciones de impacto de las rentas mínimas y universales no muestran, en media, una reducción de la oferta de trabajo, sin embargo, los resultados no siempre son homogéneos por grupos poblacionales 19 .…”
Section: Oferta De Trabajounclassified