1936
DOI: 10.2307/1537309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effect of X-Rays on Cleavage in Arbacia Eggs: Evidence of Nuclear Control of Division Rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

1938
1938
1965
1965

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The slow recovery observed in our experiments contrasts with the results of Henshaw (1936) on unfertilized sea urchin eggs. Henshaw found that recovery was a matter of a few hours and from the graph relating it to the time elapsed, he concluded that it was due to the removal of some toxic material from the egg by diffusion outwards.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The slow recovery observed in our experiments contrasts with the results of Henshaw (1936) on unfertilized sea urchin eggs. Henshaw found that recovery was a matter of a few hours and from the graph relating it to the time elapsed, he concluded that it was due to the removal of some toxic material from the egg by diffusion outwards.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The data of the table above substantiate Henshaw (1932Henshaw ( . 1940) and Henshaw and Francis (1936), who report that a delay in fertilization of irradiated and unfertilized eggs of Arbacia allows some of them to "recover"' so that the retardation in the initial cleavage normally caused by irradiation is somewhat nullified. The percentage difference is not great, after 50,000 r exposure, but the eggs irradiated at the beginning of the series started to cleave at a shorter elapsed time interval than those irradiated at the end of the series, due to the recovery phenomenon of Henshaw.…”
Section: Koi5kktsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X-rays Henshaw (1932Henshaw ( , 1938Henshaw ( , 1939 ; Henshaw and Francis (1936) ; Cohen ( 1939) ; ' Evans (1940) ; Evans and Beams (1939) The following agents have been found to be without effect upon cleavage of fertilized Arbacia eggs when tested at the molar concentrations shown, which were the highest concentrations employed (Clowes andKeltch, 1939-1941) : diethylmethylcarbinylurea, 8 X 10" 3 ; 4,4'-dinitrobenzophenone, 6 X 10~ 4 ; 2,4-dinitrophenylmercaptobenzothiazole, 2 X 10~ 3 ; morphine, 2 X 10~ 2 ; phenacetine, 8xlO~ H ; porphyrexide, 1 X 10~ 3 : 2-sulfanilylaminothiazole, 5 X 10~ 4 ; N-sulfanilylbenzamide, 5 X 10 4 ; sulfapyridine, 8 X 10" s ; synthalin, 2 X 10' 3 .…”
Section: Tablk VIImentioning
confidence: 99%