1979
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-1979-0514816-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effective choice of the smoothing norm in regularization

Abstract: Abstract.We consider ill-posed problems of the form(1) g(t) = jQKit, s)fis)ds, 0 < t « 1, where g and K are given, and we must compute /. The Tikhonov regularizaron procedure replaces (1) by a one-parameter family of minimization problems-2 Minimize i\\Kf -g\\ + aft(/))-where ft is a smoothing norm chosen by the user.We demonstrate by example that the choice of ft is not simply a matter of convenience.We then show how this choice affects the convergence rate, and the condition of the problems generated by the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result was expected since the regularisation in H2[a. b] takes into account the a priori information about the regularity of the solution. This fact confirms what is already known in other situations (see [28]).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…This result was expected since the regularisation in H2[a. b] takes into account the a priori information about the regularity of the solution. This fact confirms what is already known in other situations (see [28]).…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, a different order of derivative or, indeed, a combination of derivatives may provide a more appropriate constraint on the recovered amplitudes. Ideally, the chosen function should be directed by knowledge of the system since it will alter the efficacy of the regularisation [27]. Here, the choice was primarily motivated by ease of computation.…”
Section: Smoothed Exponential Series Methods (Sesm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal smoothing functional for deconvolution operators on an infinite domain was determined by Aref'eva (1974) (see also Cullum 1979) who showed that it is completely determined by the decay rate of the Fourier coefficients of the unknown function. Unfortunately, in real applications this result cannot be used directly because, in addition to data being available only on a finite domain, it requires the function one is trying to recover.…”
Section: Numerical Regularizationmentioning
confidence: 99%