The Effectiveness of a Systems Engineering Course in Developing Systems Thinking

Abstract

Contribution: An evaluation of the effectiveness of Systems Engineering (SE) courses in developing students' Systems Thinking (ST) capacity in both the cognitive and affective domains. A combined cognitive ST performance and affective engagement with ST assessment is proposed as an approach to assess students' ST in both domains. The results can support course change decisions and guide learning experience development. Background: SE education aims to produce graduates with strong knowledge and skills in SE and a strong appreciation of the practical value of ST, which addresses the cognitive and affective domains in education. Consequently, it is important to evaluate the effectiveness of SE courses in developing students' ST in these domains, an area that studies do not consider. Intended Outcomes: An understanding of the ST ability of undergraduate students in an SE course in a domain specific engineering program in both the cognitive and affective domains. Application Design: A study evaluated the effectiveness of two SE classes in developing students' ST capacity using a combined cognitive and affective assessment tool developed and validated in previous studies. ST assessment is determined by combining ST performance and affective engagement. To observe the transformation of students' ST capacity, a longitudinal design collected data at two times in each of two offerings of an SE course offered by the same university in two locations-Australia and Singapore. Findings: The course developed students in most dimensions of cognitive ST, but did not appear to improve students' affective engagement with ST.

A Problem-Based Introduction to Technical, Social, and Systemic Thinking in Engineering Courses

“…Thus, the current version of the student survey should be modified to increase the sensitivity of the measurement tool for changes in student attitudes, knowledge, and perceptions. A prominent option is to implement the Student Assessment of their Learning Gains (SALG) online instrument of [33] with considerations and validation methods discussed by [36] and [37].…”

Cognitive Evaluation of Examinees by Dynamic Question Set Generation based on Bloom’s Taxonomy

“…The cognitive domain introduced in Bloom's taxonomy is a hierarchical structure consisting of the aforesaid six levels. In present days more and more importance is given to outcome-based learning systems [10][11][12] for the overall growth of a student and for the all-round development from understanding a topic and to the extent of applying the gathered knowledge to design a new model or concept. Nowadays, the online mode of education is gaining popularity for its effectiveness and recent research studies have demonstrated their encouraging effect on achieving learning outcomes [13].…”