2013
DOI: 10.1080/1068316x.2011.621426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of calibrated versus default distance decay functions for geographic profiling: a preliminary examination of crime type

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Such systems are being used more and more for investigative purposes, yet there is presently little research considering how different functions affect the efficiency with which these systems operate (Canter et al, 2000;Santilla, Zappala, Laukkanen & Picozzi, 2003;Canter and Hammond, 2006;Emeno, 2008).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Geographical Offender Profiling Systems By mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such systems are being used more and more for investigative purposes, yet there is presently little research considering how different functions affect the efficiency with which these systems operate (Canter et al, 2000;Santilla, Zappala, Laukkanen & Picozzi, 2003;Canter and Hammond, 2006;Emeno, 2008).…”
Section: Effectiveness Of Geographical Offender Profiling Systems By mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributions of the distances travelled to offend by criminal samples have been consistently shown within the criminological literature to be characterized by distance decay, that is, as the distance from an offender's home or base increases the likelihood of offending decreases (Turner, 1969;Phillips, 1980;Rhodes & Conley, 1991;Rengert, Piquero &Jones, 1999, Canter andHammond, 2006;Rattner & Portnov, 2007;Emeno, 2008;Block & Bernasco, 2009). However, the relationship between distance travelled to offend and frequency of offences is non-linear and it remains unclear which of a variety of decay functions it follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debate remains rife as to which of a range of different forms of function might most appropriately encapsulate crucial features of criminal spatial behaviour (Canter and Hammond, 2006;Emeno and Bennell, 2011;Hammond and Youngs, 2011;Levine, 2002;Paulsen, 2005;2006).…”
Section: Geographical Offender Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance decay used in the above formula describes how the distant demand of one sublocation on another sublocation decreases as a function of the travel time distance between these two sublocations. We used a negative, exponential function [90][91][92][93][94] defined as follows:…”
Section: Availability Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%