1996
DOI: 10.1006/ceps.1996.0009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of the Keyword Method for Receptive and Productive Foreign Vocabulary Learning in the Elderly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research into the effectiveness of the keyword method has usually used rote rehearsal as a comparison condition. (For an exception, see Gruneberg & Pascoe, 1996.) Usually one group of participants are instructed in using the keyword mnemonic and are supplied with suggestions for the content of the image to be formed; the comparison group is instructed to rote rehearse the pairing of the English and foreign words, usually with repeated presentations like those in Experiment 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research into the effectiveness of the keyword method has usually used rote rehearsal as a comparison condition. (For an exception, see Gruneberg & Pascoe, 1996.) Usually one group of participants are instructed in using the keyword mnemonic and are supplied with suggestions for the content of the image to be formed; the comparison group is instructed to rote rehearse the pairing of the English and foreign words, usually with repeated presentations like those in Experiment 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown KM enhances immediate recall in learning vocabulary in a wide variety of languages, for example, Russian (Atkinson, 1975), German (Desrochers, Wieland, & Coté, 1991), Tagalog (Wang, Thomas, & Ouelette, 1992), and Chinese . Moreover, KM benefits not only adults, but also elderly learners (Gruneberg & Pascoe, 1996) and children (Pressley, Levin, & Miller, 1981). The method appeared effective when the experimenter provided the keywords as well as when the learners themselves generated them, though in adults the experimenter-supplied keywords seemed somewhat more effective (Atkinson, 1975;Pressley, Levin, & Delaney, 1982; but see .…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some studies required the subjects to make their own imagery linkage between the sound in L1 and L2, while some were teacher-oriented. However, most of the reviewed studies were involved with vocabulary acquisition in Spanish (Gruneberg & Pascoe, 1996), Russian (Sagarra & Alba, 2006), or other languages such as Egyptian (Brown & Perry, 1991), with quite a few studies conducted with Thai learners, using Thai words as keywords. In this study, the mnemonic keyword method (MKM) was used because the researcher wanted to provide all learners with the same picture, instead of having them create their own images, each of which might have different effects on memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%