The effectiveness of the problem-based learning model using peer assessment in vocational high school

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the effect between the Problem Based Learning model using Peer assessment and the problem-based learning model on student competencies. The study used a quantitative experimental approach conducted at SMK Negeri 1 Sragen in class XI AK 4 as a control class and XI AK 5 as an experimental class. The population involved all XI Accounting class students totaling 160 students, while the sample consisted of 64 students who were divided into the experimental class and the control class. The results showed that the first hypothesis obtained fcount data> ftable or 5.214> 2.760 and sig values. 0.026 <0.05 then H0A is rejected and H1A is accepted. Learning using the Problem Based Learning model with Peer Assessment has an average value of 83.78 higher than the average value of the Problem Based Learning model that is equal to 81.53. The conclusion from this study is that there are differences in the effect between the control class and the experimental class on student competence. The experimental class using the Problem Based Learning Model using Peer Assessment is more effective than the control class using the Problem Based Learning model.

Work Willingness of VHS Students at Post-Industrial Placement

“…The research instrument used in collecting quantitative data is a questionnaire. The purpose of distributing the questionnaire is to obtain complete information from respondents about a problem [32]. The questionnaire used in this research is a work willingness questionnaire.…”

Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa: Analisis Butir Soal Tes

“…Efektivitas proses pembelajaran dapat dilakukan dengan berbagai model pembelajaran sebagai upaya meningkatkan hasil belajar mahasiswa. Efektivitas proses pembelajaran meliputi ranah pengetahuan, keterampilan, dan sikap yang harus dimiliki oleh mahasiswa (Anggraini et al, 2020). Pembelajaran yang efektif dipengaruhi oleh faktor internal dan eksternal (Hapnita, 2018;Retnowati et al, 2016;Arpan & Marpanaji, 2015;Sutjiato et al, 2015).…”