2021
DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2021.1915217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effectiveness of the Safety Planning Intervention for Adults Experiencing Suicide-Related Distress: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Content could include conducting collaborative psychosocial suicide and self-harm assessments and safety planning, in addition to addressing core communication skills to better enable identification of suicide and self-harm and promote good rapport, as young people have highlighted that this is an area that needs improvement [ 25 ], and past research has demonstrated problems in the way healthcare professionals frame suicide assessment questions [ 93 ]. Although training in assessments and interventions, and communication and therapeutic skills, may be met with resistance from a small number of GPs who believe such interventions are outside their role or that communication skills are “set”, research has shown that collaborative psychosocial assessments and safety planning improves disclosure of risk and outcomes on suicide-related measures, and are acceptable and feasible to young people and practitioners [ 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 ]. Similarly, suicide and self-harm training that focuses on improving communication and relational skills is effective [ 102 , 103 , 104 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Content could include conducting collaborative psychosocial suicide and self-harm assessments and safety planning, in addition to addressing core communication skills to better enable identification of suicide and self-harm and promote good rapport, as young people have highlighted that this is an area that needs improvement [ 25 ], and past research has demonstrated problems in the way healthcare professionals frame suicide assessment questions [ 93 ]. Although training in assessments and interventions, and communication and therapeutic skills, may be met with resistance from a small number of GPs who believe such interventions are outside their role or that communication skills are “set”, research has shown that collaborative psychosocial assessments and safety planning improves disclosure of risk and outcomes on suicide-related measures, and are acceptable and feasible to young people and practitioners [ 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 ]. Similarly, suicide and self-harm training that focuses on improving communication and relational skills is effective [ 102 , 103 , 104 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, health professionals working in suicide prevention have identified that developing stronger links with families would enhance their ability to deliver safe care for those experiencing suicidal behaviour [ 63 ]. Brief evidence-based strategies for carer involvement in this context include safety planning, which could be used to highlight the role of carers in suicide prevention and important factors such as managing lethal means at home [ 64 , 65 ]. At a systemic level, alternative models of mental health care that foreground social relationships are likely to promote carer engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some consumers felt that their safety planning was not tailored to meet their individual psychosocial needs, and subsequently questioned the utility of the plan. Currently, there is limited systematic evaluation of suicide safety planning as an intervention [39][40][41][42]. Nevertheless, expert guidelines stress the importance of a tailored and collaborative discharge care plan that highlights relevant strategies for the consumer and provides them with autonomy over ongoing treatment [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%