2001
DOI: 10.1002/gps.344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effectiveness of very short scales for depression screening in elderly medical patients†

Abstract: The very short scales performed just as well as the widely used longer screening scales in this population. They are worthy of further examination in elderly populations at risk of depression, and may be particularly suitable for older adults due to their brevity and ease of use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
1
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(28 reference statements)
4
77
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies of patients with cancer found that brief selfreport scales assessing depressive symptoms performed well when compared with more comprehensive depression scales or interviews. [38][39][40][41] In addition, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has developed a simple 1-item screening tool for emotional distress in individuals with cancer. 42 The NCCN guidelines include an algorithm for further evaluation, diagnosis of depression, and appropriate interventions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies of patients with cancer found that brief selfreport scales assessing depressive symptoms performed well when compared with more comprehensive depression scales or interviews. [38][39][40][41] In addition, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) has developed a simple 1-item screening tool for emotional distress in individuals with cancer. 42 The NCCN guidelines include an algorithm for further evaluation, diagnosis of depression, and appropriate interventions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…333). También es interesante recordar que el resultado obtenido para este factor está compuesto precisamente por todos los items que no aparecen en la versión de la GDS de 15 items (35), lo que puede representar una ventaja para la versión reducida, sobre todo ante estudios epidemiológicos (32) o en su uso cotidiano en atención primaria (36,37).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Sin embargo, algunos resultados derivados de la validez de contenido de los items, de la consistencia interna de la escala y de la consistencia los factores hallados, parecen aconsejar la reducción de la GDS. Esto respaldaría las ventajas que se han otorgado a la versión de 15 items (32,35,36,37).…”
Section: Montorio (5)unclassified
“…Single item measures are short, easy to administer, less time consuming, and not monotonous to complete (Gardner, Cummings, Dunham, & Pierce, 1998;Pomeroy, Clark, & Philip, 2001). They reduce response biases and are, therefore, relevant for use in large-scale studies (Robins, Hendin, & Trzesniewski, 2001).…”
Section: Roundmentioning
confidence: 99%