The Effectiveness of Warning Labels for Consumers: A Meta-Analytic Investigation into Their Underlying Process and Contingencies

Abstract

Although several meta-analyses have been conducted on the effectiveness of warning labels, many questions regarding their effectiveness remain unanswered. The authors identify 243 effect sizes from 66 primary articles, more than three times the number of effect sizes included in the most comprehensive meta-analysis to date. This updated and substantially larger data set shows that label effectiveness is contingent on the type of expected behavioral outcome. Labels aimed at moderation/cessation display a generally diminishing cascade of effects from attention (r = .32), comprehension (r = .37), recall (r = .31), judgment (r = .22), and behavior (r = .18). Labels targeting safe use show stronger effect sizes for behavior (r = .39) despite displaying a downward trend for attention (r = .35), comprehension (r = .29), recall (r = .32), and judgment (r = .21). The authors also find evidence of increased effectiveness when preactivating the label by means of an integrated communication strategy (r = .49). In addition, the results show the impact of several contextual factors (e.g., social influence [r = .33] and exposure frequency [r = .12]).

Impact of a negative emotional antitobacco mass media campaign on French smokers: a longitudinal study

“…However, researchers have underlined that prevention messages should be analysed in their specific cultural and environmental contexts related to consumption habits, social influence and so on 46. Indeed, cultural patterns are particularly important as they influence people’s comprehension and perceptions of risks displayed in prevention messages 47…”

Evidence-Based Cannabis Policy: A Framework to Guide Marketing and Public Policy Research

“…Some state laws require warning labels for cannabis that are designed to help consumers avoid problems such as intoxication/impairment, dependency, and health risks. Although there is an extensive literature on the effectiveness of warning labels on a variety of products (e.g., Purmehdi et al 2017), it is critical that cannabis warnings are scientifically sound and formatted in a way shown to be impactful. Other on-packaging marketing communications that may warrant regulation include product claims, especially potential health benefits (or lack thereof) for CBD products.…”

A Description–Experience Framework of the Dynamic Response to Risk

“…It is commonly thought that descriptive warnings are often ignored and may even backfire (Andrews, 2011;Steinhart, Carmon, & Trope, 2013). Meta-analyses on the efficacy of warnings have highlighted factors that shape their success, such as intended behavioral outcome, audience characteristics, message content, and delivery modes (e.g., Argo & Main, 2004;Purmehdi, Legoux, Carrillat, & Senecal, 2017). While such analyses are important for designing more effective warnings, it is also important to consider the target audience's experiential starting point.…”