2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of 90-day supplementation with the Omega-3 essential fatty acid docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on cognitive function and visual acuity in a healthy aging population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, the level of DHA in the brain could increase with development and decrease with aging, and it contributes to the improvement of memory and other cognitive functions among patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) [3]. Randomized controlled trials have investigated the efficacy of n-3 FAs therapy in both impaired and non-impaired patients [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, these studies have drawn inconsistent conclusions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, the level of DHA in the brain could increase with development and decrease with aging, and it contributes to the improvement of memory and other cognitive functions among patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) [3]. Randomized controlled trials have investigated the efficacy of n-3 FAs therapy in both impaired and non-impaired patients [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. However, these studies have drawn inconsistent conclusions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a lower dose of DHA (i.e. 252 mg/day DHA compared to 800 mg/day and 900 mg/day in Johnson et al (2008) and Yurko-Mauro et al (2010), respectively) did not influence cognitive function (Stough et al, 2012). The discrepancy in results may be due to methodological differences in the Stough and colleagues (2012) study design, including differences in DHA dose, treatment duration (limited to 90 days), or wide age range (45À77 years).…”
Section: Rcts: Healthy Older Adultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…From the four studies in young volunteers, one was negative (Benton et al 2013), one found no effects (Jackson et al 2012), and two found at best marginal positive effects (Karr et al 2012;Stonehouse et al 2013). In elderly, two trials were positive (Lee et al 2013;Yurko-Mauro et al 2010), one where phosphatidylserine was added was marginally positive (Vakhapova et al 2010) and two found no difference (Dangour et al 2010;Stough et al 2012). Although different doses and different compositions of the relative contributions of EFA and DHA were used, there was no obvious relation with dose.…”
Section: Pufasmentioning
confidence: 97%