2015
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhu333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Age on the Neural Correlates of Recollection Success, Recollection-Related Cortical Reinstatement, and Post-Retrieval Monitoring

Abstract: Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was used to investigate whether age-related differences in episodic memory performance are accompanied by a reduction in the specificity of recollected information. We addressed this question by comparing recollection-related cortical reinstatement in young and older adults. At study, subjects viewed objects and concrete words, making 1 of 2 different semantic judgments depending on the study material. Test items were words that corresponded to studied words or the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

25
116
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
25
116
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Even among studies where this confound is arguably largely absent – for example, where the critical contrast is between correctly recognized test items accorded accurate vs. inaccurate source memory judgments, or items endorsed as ‘remembered’ vs. ‘known’ – the findings are inconsistent, ranging from reports of reductions in retrieval-success effects in older compared with younger individuals, to null findings, through to enhanced effects in older participants (e.g., Duarte et al, 2008; Kukolja et al, 2009; Tsukiura et al, 2010; Dulas & Duarte, 2012; Angel et al, 2013; Cansino et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2016; see Wang & Cabeza, in press, for a review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Even among studies where this confound is arguably largely absent – for example, where the critical contrast is between correctly recognized test items accorded accurate vs. inaccurate source memory judgments, or items endorsed as ‘remembered’ vs. ‘known’ – the findings are inconsistent, ranging from reports of reductions in retrieval-success effects in older compared with younger individuals, to null findings, through to enhanced effects in older participants (e.g., Duarte et al, 2008; Kukolja et al, 2009; Tsukiura et al, 2010; Dulas & Duarte, 2012; Angel et al, 2013; Cansino et al, 2015; Wang et al, 2016; see Wang & Cabeza, in press, for a review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This refers to control processes responsible for evaluating the outcome of a retrieval attempt in relation to behavioral goals (Burgess & Shallice, 1996; Rugg, 2004). The neural correlates of monitoring are identified by contrasting retrieval cues eliciting weak versus strong memory signals (e.g., Henson et al, 1999, 2000; Achim & Lepage, 2005; Wang et al, 2016). These prior studies have consistently implicated right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rDLPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in monitoring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, training an associative memory strategy may involve similar brain mechanisms in children, younger adults, and older adults when investigating a fine-grained contrast, namely encoding success (see Mark & Rugg, 1998;Li et al, 2004;Wang et al, 2015 for similar findings regarding retrieval success). The reductions in SM effects indicate that activations for later on remembered and not-remembered items during encoding became more similar as a function of training.…”
Section: Comparable Training-induced Reductions In Sm Effects Across mentioning
confidence: 93%