The effects of applying filters on EEG signals for classifying developers’ code comprehension

Abstract

EEG signals are a relevant indicator for measuring aspects related to human factors in Software Engineering. EEG is used in software engineering to train machine learning techniques for a wide range of applications, including classifying task difficulty, and developers’ level of experience. The EEG signal contains noise such as abnormal readings, electrical interference, and eye movements, which are usually not of interest to the analysis, and therefore contribute to the lack of precision of the machine learning techniques. However, research in software engineering has not evidenced the effectiveness when applying these filters on EEG signals. The objective of this work is to analyze the effectiveness of filters on EEG signals in the software engineering context. As literature did not focus on the classification of developers’ code comprehension, this study focuses on the analysis of the effectiveness of applying EEG filters for training a machine learning technique to classify developers' code comprehension. A Random Forest (RF) machine learning technique was trained with filtered EEG signals to classify the developers' code comprehension. This study also trained another random forest classifier with unfiltered EEG data. Both models were trained using 10-fold cross-validation. This work measures the classifiers' effectiveness using the f-measure metric. This work used the t-test, Wilcoxon, and U Mann Whitney to analyze the difference in the effectiveness measures (f-measure) between the classifier trained with filtered EEG and the classifier trained with unfiltered EEG. The tests pointed out that there is a significant difference after applying EEG filters to classify developers' code comprehension with the random forest classifier. The conclusion is that the use of EEG filters significantly improves the effectivity to classify code comprehension using the random forest technique.

Classification of Resampled Pediatric Epilepsy EEG Data Using Artificial Neural Networks with Discrete Fourier Transforms

“…Therefore, performing complex and time-consuming 2D signal processing on EEG signals can be a computationally demanding task. In recent literature, studies are also being conducted using normal machine learning classification methods for EEG signals [31], [32]. These studies have achieved classifier performance at levels of 98.4 % and 0.98 AUC [6].…”

MBPPE: A Modular Batch Processing Platform for Electroencephalography

“…Given that artifacts, such as ocular and cardiac components in EEG signals, are produced by independent sources, ICA serves as a powerful tool to model EEG signals and distinguish different components originating from a single signal source. Using ICA to separate the original data enables the removal of artifacts present in the independent components, yielding clean EEG signals [16]. It is noteworthy that this method, when reconstructing EEG signals, not only preserves the temporal resolution but also enhances its spatial characteristics by identifying as many as several dozens of independent EEG signal sources active in different time segments, as well as their scalp projections [17].…”

“…Then, we perform an FFT for each signal segment, converting the EEG data into a frequency-domain representation. After that, we focus on five frequency ranges: delta (1-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-13 Hz), beta (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31), and gamma (31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50). For these frequency ranges, we use Parseval's theorem to calculate the energy values of each segment separately, and the differential entropy is the log representation of these energies.…”

Predicting Tacit Coordination Success Using Electroencephalogram Trajectories: The Impact of Task Difficulty

“…These steps included applying band-pass filtering (BPF) in the range of [1,32] Hz to capture the delta, theta, alpha, and beta frequency bands. These bands are crucial for the cognitive tasks under investigation and are less susceptible to high-frequency noise [21,22]. After band-pass filtering, artifacts were removed using Independent Component Analysis (ICA), followed by re-referencing the average reference, baseline correction, and downsampling from 512 Hz to 64 Hz.…”