2014
DOI: 10.1075/wll.17.1.06hip
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of bilingual education on the English language and literacy outcomes of Chinese-speaking children

Abstract: To evaluate the effects of bilingual education on minority-language children’s English language and literacy outcomes, we compared grade 1 Chinese-speaking Canadian children enrolled in three different instructional programs (French Immersion, Chinese-English Paired Bilingual, English-only). ANCOVA results revealed that the French immersion children outperformed the other two groups on measures of English phonological awareness and word reading and that the bilingual groups were comparable to monolingual Engli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, little is known about the vocabulary outcomes of ELs in French immersion. A recent study has shown that the English vocabulary scores of Mandarin-speaking students in French immersion in grade 1 were comparable to those of a normative sample (Hipfner-Boucher, Lam, & Chen, 2014 ). However, the study involved a small sample of 22 students.…”
Section: Vocabularymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Conversely, little is known about the vocabulary outcomes of ELs in French immersion. A recent study has shown that the English vocabulary scores of Mandarin-speaking students in French immersion in grade 1 were comparable to those of a normative sample (Hipfner-Boucher, Lam, & Chen, 2014 ). However, the study involved a small sample of 22 students.…”
Section: Vocabularymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The few existing studies on Canadian FI programs have included younger children developing word reading skills. In these studies, multilingual and bilingual children came from households where parents had a relatively high level of educationdescribed as "middle-class" with some post-secondary educationand lived in households that generally supported language and literacy development in all languages (e.g., Au-Yeung et al, 2015;Dagenais, 2003;Hipfner-Boucher et al, 2014). One study by Au-Yeung et al (2015) examined the effects of bilingual education on the development of language proficiency and reading comprehension skills in the L2 and L3 of multilingual students from Grade 1 to Grade 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment country (i.e., whether English-dominant, such as Canada or the US, or non-English dominant, such as Singapore; Table 11 and Figure 11) did not mediate the relationship between English phonological awareness and word/non-word reading. However, this may be due to statistical power; only 11/33 independent studies assessed English phonological awareness and word/non-word reading skills across the two countries (Hipfner-Boucher et al, 2014;Yeong et al, 2014;Hsu et al, 2019;O'Brien et al, 2019;Lam et al, 2012;Ríos-López et al, 2017). We could not examine influences of assessment country on Chinese literacy skills, as few studies assessed both languages (Hsu et al, 2019;Mak, 2014).…”
Section: Interim Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing both languages will also enable investigation of factors facilitating -or inhibiting -biliteracy development and cross-language transfer of emergent literacy skills, in speakers of disparate orthographic combinations such as Chinese-English bilinguals (Bérubé & Marinova-Todd, 2012;Hipfner-Boucher et al, 2014;Lam et al, 2012). Reading models, including Script Dependent Hypothesis (SDH) and Linguistic Interdependence Hypothesis (LIH), have predominantly examined reading development in monolingual readers of alphabetic and non-alphabetic languages, and cross-language transfer effects in alphabetic-alphabetic bilinguals (e.g., Ellis & Hooper, 2001).…”
Section: Interim Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation