2002
DOI: 10.1079/phn2002275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of birth weight and postnatal linear growth retardation on body mass index, fatness and fat distribution in mid and late childhood

Abstract: Children stunted in early childhood had less fat and lower BMI than non-stunted children but had a more central fat distribution that was partially explained by their lower birth weights. The association between birth weight and central fat distribution developed between 7 and 11 years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
54
2
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
54
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 In our earlier follow-up of this cohort at age 11 years, stunted children had higher SSF/TSF ratios than non-stunted children, but this difference was largely due to birth weight, which predicted central obesity and differed between the groups. 10 The stunted subjects remained significantly shorter than the non-stunted group. However, there was substantial catch-up growth in the stunted group and only 10.7% still had height-for-age below -2 s.d.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…12,13 In our earlier follow-up of this cohort at age 11 years, stunted children had higher SSF/TSF ratios than non-stunted children, but this difference was largely due to birth weight, which predicted central obesity and differed between the groups. 10 The stunted subjects remained significantly shorter than the non-stunted group. However, there was substantial catch-up growth in the stunted group and only 10.7% still had height-for-age below -2 s.d.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…At age 11 years, the stunted children had lower BMIs and less fat than non-stunted children, but a more central fat distribution. 10 Follow-up study At age 17-18 years, 167 participants were located and measured, 78% of those enrolled in childhood. Loss to the study was not different by group and was primarily due to migration, which accounted for 73% of children lost.…”
Section: Initial Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the undernourished children there was substantial catch up growth and they had more central distribution of fat than the adequately nourished children (Walker et al, 2002). These children form an ideal group on which to test the robustness of BMI for both obesity tracking and as a screening tool in children with varying nutritional histories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%