2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2012.07.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of body mass index on surface electrocardiograms in young adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown, P wave area yielded the highest correlation with LA size (r = 0.42, p<0.001), although heteroscedasticity was present for this correlation (p<0.001), as well as for other ECG variables. Moreover, despite larger body size indices (which might be expected to attenuate measures of P wave dimensions)[23][24] among patients without LA dilation, P wave area yielded similar magnitude of correlation with both unadjusted (r = 0.41, p<0.001) and body surface area indexed (r = 0.42, p<0.001) left atrial area, with similarly minimal impact of body size adjustment for all other P wave indices. P wave area in lead V1 remained significantly associated with LA area (p<0.001) on CMR in both forced and stepwise linear regression analyses that controlled for P wave area in all other surface ECG leads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As shown, P wave area yielded the highest correlation with LA size (r = 0.42, p<0.001), although heteroscedasticity was present for this correlation (p<0.001), as well as for other ECG variables. Moreover, despite larger body size indices (which might be expected to attenuate measures of P wave dimensions)[23][24] among patients without LA dilation, P wave area yielded similar magnitude of correlation with both unadjusted (r = 0.41, p<0.001) and body surface area indexed (r = 0.42, p<0.001) left atrial area, with similarly minimal impact of body size adjustment for all other P wave indices. P wave area in lead V1 remained significantly associated with LA area (p<0.001) on CMR in both forced and stepwise linear regression analyses that controlled for P wave area in all other surface ECG leads.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…6 The mean BMI of their patients was 27 kg/m 2 and it was speculated that this was potentially because obese patients have smaller R-wave amplitudes related to the subcutaneous fat between the heart and electrode. 6 No one has studied the effect of BMI on S-ICD screening test lead ECG morphology per se, but we found 1 study that looked at the BMI effect on the 12-lead ECG 24 greater BMI led to lower values of R-and T-wave axes, indicating a rightward shift of both. Furthermore, R-wave voltage and T-wave amplitudes appeared to be BMI dependent, although it peaked at a BMI of 18.5 kg/m 2 and diminished with further increases in weight.…”
Section: Predictors Of Eligibility In Brsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It is well known that QRS duration is an independent predictor of CRT response, especially when differentiating between QRS duration values below and over 150 milliseconds . Moreover, the T‐wave amplitude is known to be smaller in patients with large BMI, possibly simply related to the larger distance of the surface to the heart. Large BMI is known, for not well‐understood reasons, to reduce CRT response .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%