2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of bone remodeling on biomechanical behavior in a patient with an implant-supported overdenture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors [ 33 , 34 ] investigated the load distribution between 2 implants supporting a fixed partial denture and revealed the effects of splinting the superstructure on the load distribution to both implants. Shigemitsu et al [ 35 , 36 ] used the same transducers and revealed that the load on each implant was smaller in a 4 implant-supported mandibular complete overdenture than that in 2 implant-supported type. Kobari et al [ 37 ] applied this system to a 3-unit implant-supported fixed partial denture and investigated the effects of different numbers and configurations of supporting implants on the load distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors [ 33 , 34 ] investigated the load distribution between 2 implants supporting a fixed partial denture and revealed the effects of splinting the superstructure on the load distribution to both implants. Shigemitsu et al [ 35 , 36 ] used the same transducers and revealed that the load on each implant was smaller in a 4 implant-supported mandibular complete overdenture than that in 2 implant-supported type. Kobari et al [ 37 ] applied this system to a 3-unit implant-supported fixed partial denture and investigated the effects of different numbers and configurations of supporting implants on the load distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bing et al [40] reported an increased risk of implant fracture associated with the amount of bone resorption due to peri-implantitis using an FEA of in vivo measured loads. The in vivo load data have also already been evaluated using FEA to investigate the distribution of peri-implant bone in a stimulation [34][35][36]. Indeed, the reliability of the simulation result was substantially improved using the in vivo measured value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the interaction of ion beams passing through layers and structures with different properties has revealed the importance of choosing the closest biomaterials to biological tissues. These studies have been the subject of research not only in heavy ions but also in conventional beams [ 36 ]. The effect of Al 2 O 3 and ZrO 2 ceramic biomaterials on the dose was investigated with the help of different ionizing rays and MC [ 37 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from various inflammatory complications (like peri‐implantitis, peri‐implant mucositis etc. ), 44 biomechanical complications are also seen to affect the functioning of dental prosthesis 2,45 . Biomechanical overloading at the implant–bone interface had been reported to cause implant failure by inducing bone resorption overtime 3,46 and implant's macrogeometry (like implant diameter, length thread profile, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), 44 biomechanical complications are also seen to affect the functioning of dental prosthesis. 2,45 Biomechanical overloading at the implant-bone interface had been reported to cause implant failure by inducing bone resorption overtime 3,46 and implant's macrogeometry (like implant diameter, length thread profile, etc.) is a vital design factor dictating the long-term biomechanical outcome at the peri-implant bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%