2007
DOI: 10.14227/dt140207p19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Buffer Molarity, Agitation Rate, and Mesh Size on Verapamil Release from Modified-Release Mini-Tablets Using USP Apparatus 3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors stipulated that higher agitation speeds led to quicker drug release, although no statistical analysis was used and error bars were not presented, questioning whether any significance was achieved within this agitation range and this system [35]. The effect of agitation was, however, also demonstrated in other studies, enforcing the concerns about the critical role of this parameter, although not sufficiently studied yet in hydrogel systems [113,[115][116][117]. Table 4 provides the parameters that have been used for the limited in vitro release studies from various hydrogel drug delivery systems.…”
Section: Agitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors stipulated that higher agitation speeds led to quicker drug release, although no statistical analysis was used and error bars were not presented, questioning whether any significance was achieved within this agitation range and this system [35]. The effect of agitation was, however, also demonstrated in other studies, enforcing the concerns about the critical role of this parameter, although not sufficiently studied yet in hydrogel systems [113,[115][116][117]. Table 4 provides the parameters that have been used for the limited in vitro release studies from various hydrogel drug delivery systems.…”
Section: Agitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, hydrogel-drug delivery system samples are immersed in a releasing medium, partly mimicking physiological conditions in terms of pH (saline buffer) with control over temperature and CO 2 concentration (using incubators) [8,19,61,68]. Agitation, ionic strength, enzymatic presence/absence are other parameters that are often controlled in the final release system [12,35,37,113]. At every time point, supernatant samples are collected for drug concentration analysis.…”
Section: Release Assays and Interpretation Of Release Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Initially, in Method M1, the influence of the immersion rate of 5, 15, 30, 40 and 50 dpm were evaluated, as previously indicated by Borst et al 22) The comparison was conducted in a series of media at defined times; HCl (pH 1.2) -1 h, ABS (pH 4.5) -2 h, PBS (pH 5.8) -1 h, PBS (pH 6.8) -5 h, PBS (pH 7.2) -1 h, which are based on the physiological transit time and the specific pH in each portion of the GIT. 11,23) The percentage of MTF dissolved during 10 h by Method M1 was greater than 85% for 30, 40 and 50 dpm immersion rates with the dissolved amount of drug proportional to the increase in the immersion rate, as shown in Fig. 2A.…”
Section: Development Of a Dissolution Methods With Uspmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In vitro drug-release studies were performed using USP Apparatus 3 (VanKel Industries, New Jersey, USA) as described (10) to determine the effect of continuous pH change over time on drug-release characteristics. A model VK 750D digitally controlled water circulation/heater (VanKel Industries, New Jersey, USA) was used to maintain the temperature of the dissolution media of different buffers of different pH values (180 mL per vessel) at 37 ± 0.5 °C.…”
Section: In Vitro Dissolution Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%