2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of computer-aided anteroposterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
59
1
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
59
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…This method was endorsed by several investigators 4,8,9,16,19,23 because of its simplicity and speed, being easily understood by the examiners and widespread in literature. In this study the VAS scale was characterized as a 100 mm line, where zero represented that profiles contained in the same sheet were the same and in the opposite extreme, that they were very different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was endorsed by several investigators 4,8,9,16,19,23 because of its simplicity and speed, being easily understood by the examiners and widespread in literature. In this study the VAS scale was characterized as a 100 mm line, where zero represented that profiles contained in the same sheet were the same and in the opposite extreme, that they were very different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este método se utilizó para cuantifi car las emociones sobre el impacto estético de la inclinación del incisivo central superior en la sonrisa, siendo una herramienta utilizada en varias investigaciones debido a su simplicidad, evitando el sesgo hacia valores preferidos que se encuentran con escalas numéricas o de intervalo, permitiendo un mejor análisis de la cantidad y permitiendo examinar mejor la importancia de las diferencias en las distribuciones (2,14,15). En el presente estudio se realizó una valoración cuantitativa donde se encontraron que la percepción en pacientes presentó un valor de 7,17 cm ± 1,56 cm; mientras que en los estudiantes se obtuvo una valoración 6,74 cm ± 1,32.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Presentando dichas fotografías algunos distractores como: el cabello, los ojos, la nariz, las cejas, el tono de piel etc., lo que pudo afectar la evaluación. Sin embargo, otros estudios (14,16) incluyen también la presencia de dichos distractores para obtener información verdadera con respecto a la evaluación del atractivo facial. Ghaleb y col. (2) y Cao y col. (5) utilizaron fotografías de perfi l similares a las nuestras siendo éstas más importantes, que sólo el atractivo de la condición dental.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…In a study by Pithon et al (5), the same images were reviewed by laypeople of three age groups (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44), and 65-74 years, respectively). The results of that study showed that older people had more difficultly perceiving black spaces than the younger subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess esthetic perception by students and laypeople. The VAS is a simple and practical method to evaluate esthetic preferences on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 = least attractive; 5 = attractive; and 10 = most attractive (12,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%