2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01030.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Culture and Structure on Strategic Flexibility during Business Model Innovation

Abstract: This study uses responses from 107 multinational firms to reveal CEO perceptions of the drivers of strategic flexibility during business model innovation. While the positive effect of creative culture is confirmed, partner reliance reduces strategic flexibility during business model innovation. Further, structural change is disaggregated into efforts that either focus managerial attention on core activities or reconfigure existing activities. CEOs perceive that structural flexibility requires structural simpli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
281
2
15

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 390 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
8
281
2
15
Order By: Relevance
“…See Table 1 for an overview of benefits of BMI clustered into three categories. Sorescu et al (2011) • Strategic flexibility Bock et al (2012) and Pohle and Chapman (2006) • Focus/specialisation Pohle and Chapman (2006) • Risk reduction Serrat (2012) • Outperform competition Hamel and Skarzynski (2001) Customer attraction • Enter/create new markets Sako (2012) and Kim and Mauborgne (2004) • Expand product or service portfolio Hamel and Skarzynski (2001) and Mitchell and Coles (2004b) • Attract new customer segments Anderson and Kupp (2008), Bock et al (2012), Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart (2010), Gambardella and McGahan (2010) …”
Section: Potential Benefits Of Bmimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See Table 1 for an overview of benefits of BMI clustered into three categories. Sorescu et al (2011) • Strategic flexibility Bock et al (2012) and Pohle and Chapman (2006) • Focus/specialisation Pohle and Chapman (2006) • Risk reduction Serrat (2012) • Outperform competition Hamel and Skarzynski (2001) Customer attraction • Enter/create new markets Sako (2012) and Kim and Mauborgne (2004) • Expand product or service portfolio Hamel and Skarzynski (2001) and Mitchell and Coles (2004b) • Attract new customer segments Anderson and Kupp (2008), Bock et al (2012), Casadesus-Masanell and Ricart (2010), Gambardella and McGahan (2010) …”
Section: Potential Benefits Of Bmimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further round of conceptual (Baden-Fuller & Haefliger, 2013;Cavalcante, Kesting, & Ulhøi, 2011;DaSilva & Trkman, 2014;Morris, 2013), deductive (Bock & George, 2011;Bock, Opsahl, George, & Gann, 2012;Visnjic Kastalli & Van Looy, 2013;Wei, Yang, Sun, & Gu, 2014) and inductive research (Aspara, Lamberg, Laukia, & Tikkanen, 2011;Cavalcante, 2014;Hacklin & Wallnöfer, 2012;Taran, Boer, & Lindgren, 2015;Velu & Stiles, 2013) followed. Literature reviews (Lambert & Davidson, 2013;Zott et al, 2011) that frame the state of the art in business model research and identify related research agendas (Arend, 2013;Baden-Fuller & Mangematin, 2013;Eckhardt, 2013;Zott & Amit, 2013) have emerged to provide an account of existing research and to guide future research.…”
Section: In Order To Act In a Scientificmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the possibilities and capacity to perform the business model innovation may differ for different types of companies. Organizational culture and structure would influence the process and outcomes of innovations targeting companies; business model (Bock et al, 2012). In this regard, small and medium companies may lack the necessary resources already in place to perform the innovation but, on the contrary, may be more agile to reach rather than large companies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%