2019
DOI: 10.1111/jan.13912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of depressive symptom management interventions on low‐income mothers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract: Aim To evaluate the effects of depressive symptom management interventions (DSMI) for low‐income mothers. Background Depressive symptoms and depression are common complications following childbirth. Depressive symptoms experienced by low‐income mothers negatively affect infant–toddler development. Design A systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted to provide a synthesized and critical appraisal of the included studies. Data Sources We conducted a systematic search of randomized controlled trials in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
(66 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nine reviews examined psychoeducational interventions including symptom management, peer support, mindfulness, and exercise-based interventions. All of these reviews examined interventions that were entirely or mostly delivered within the postnatal period, with most reporting that these interventions positively impacted upon parental mental illness, with mixed effect sizes (see Table 1) (Alexander, 2018; Daley et al, 2009; Kim & Lee, 2019; Leger & Letourneau, 2015; Morrell, 2006; Shi & MacBeth, 2017; Song et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nine reviews examined psychoeducational interventions including symptom management, peer support, mindfulness, and exercise-based interventions. All of these reviews examined interventions that were entirely or mostly delivered within the postnatal period, with most reporting that these interventions positively impacted upon parental mental illness, with mixed effect sizes (see Table 1) (Alexander, 2018; Daley et al, 2009; Kim & Lee, 2019; Leger & Letourneau, 2015; Morrell, 2006; Shi & MacBeth, 2017; Song et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%