2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.03.160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of different drying methods on the morphology and physical properties of mesoporous silica nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the conventional oven-drying was shown inadequate for drying MNP dispersions compared to the electrospinning method. The reason could be the exposure of MNP dispersion to high temperature (i.e., 90 • C) during drying and longlasting drying process compared to the electrospinning, which could be classified as a non-thermal drying method (Aguirre-Sánchez et al, 2019). During oven-drying MNPs are exposed to instabilities, which result in irreversible particle aggregation and increased mean particle size after their reconstitution.…”
Section: Throughout Evaluation Of the Final Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the conventional oven-drying was shown inadequate for drying MNP dispersions compared to the electrospinning method. The reason could be the exposure of MNP dispersion to high temperature (i.e., 90 • C) during drying and longlasting drying process compared to the electrospinning, which could be classified as a non-thermal drying method (Aguirre-Sánchez et al, 2019). During oven-drying MNPs are exposed to instabilities, which result in irreversible particle aggregation and increased mean particle size after their reconstitution.…”
Section: Throughout Evaluation Of the Final Formulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, different drying methods for the transformation of MNP dispersions in dry products have been investigated in the last two decades (Amstad et al, 2009;Gamarra et al, 2005;Stocke et al, 2015;Vaz-Ramos et al, 2020). The thermal drying methods (e.g., spray-drying) represent a high risk for MNP agglomeration during the drying process, therefore the non-thermal methods (e.g., freeze-drying) are usually preferred (Aguirre-Sánchez et al, 2019). The most commonly used drying method for nanoparticle dispersions in general is freeze-drying (Ataide et al, 2021;Degobert and Aydin, 2021;Mohammady et al, 2020;Trenkenschuh and Friess, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dry product was dispersed partially, but agglomerates were still visible to the naked eye, indicating the procedure to be inefficient. The main reason might be the exposure of the sample to 90 °C and the long duration of the drying process, as already described in the literature [ 25 , 31 ]. On the other hand, we managed to reconstitute SPIONs from the lyophilizate, but the SPION hydrodynamic size in the reconstituted dispersion was significantly bigger compared to the SPION hydrodynamic size after their reconstitution from the electrospun products ( Figure 9 a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last two decades, several methods have been developed and investigated to transform nanoparticle dispersion into a stable and easily dispersible dry product. These drying methods include freeze-drying [ 6 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 ], spray-drying [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ], spray–freeze drying [ 20 , 21 , 22 ], conventional drying in a heated oven [ 23 , 24 ], alcohol desiccation [ 23 , 25 ], vacuum drying [ 24 ], fluid-bed granulation [ 12 , 26 , 27 , 28 ], fluid-bed pellet coating [ 29 ], and supercritical fluids drying [ 30 ]. However, the majority of these drying methods has certain important limitations, which hinder their broader use in the drying of nanoparticle dispersions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%