1972
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182000029644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of drugs on worm expulsion in theNippostrongylus brasiliensisinfected rat: a discussion of the interpretation of drug action

Abstract: In rats treated with compound 48/80 or histamine, worm expulsion was inhibited. Treatment with a histidine decarboxylase inhibitor accelerated worm expulsion. Treatment with compound 48/80 elevates histamine and histidine decarboxylase levels and reduces circulating reagin titres. These results show that histamine is not responsible for worm expulsion.Compounds such as isoprenaline and theophylline which increase cellular levels of cyclic 3′,5-AMP, prevented worm expulsion.It is concluded that the evidence tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(17 reference statements)
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies led to the suggestion that the amines participate in the immune response against T. colubriformis, and that basophils, therefore, function as effec tor cells carrying histamine to, and releasing it at the site of infection. Similar studies in other host-parasite systems, notably in rats infected with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis have also led to the suggestion that the amines are involved in nematode rejection [Urquhart et al, 1965;Jarrett et al, 1967], However, Keller and Ogilvie [1972] and Kelly and Dineen [1972] have pointed out that caution is needed in interpretation of the results of experiments in which drugs are used to inhibit worm expulsion. In addi tion, because histamine levels in the whole small intestine of rats during a primary infection with N. brasiliensis were lower than in uninfected con trols, Keller [1971] concluded histamine was not involved in rejection of the nematode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These studies led to the suggestion that the amines participate in the immune response against T. colubriformis, and that basophils, therefore, function as effec tor cells carrying histamine to, and releasing it at the site of infection. Similar studies in other host-parasite systems, notably in rats infected with Nippostrongylus brasiliensis have also led to the suggestion that the amines are involved in nematode rejection [Urquhart et al, 1965;Jarrett et al, 1967], However, Keller and Ogilvie [1972] and Kelly and Dineen [1972] have pointed out that caution is needed in interpretation of the results of experiments in which drugs are used to inhibit worm expulsion. In addi tion, because histamine levels in the whole small intestine of rats during a primary infection with N. brasiliensis were lower than in uninfected con trols, Keller [1971] concluded histamine was not involved in rejection of the nematode.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…que nous avons obtenu par des traitements au maléate de dexchlorphéniramine (antihistaminique) et à la cyproheptadine (antisérotonine et antihistaminique) rejoint les résultats obtenus avec la cyproheptadine (Keller et Ogilvie, 1972), la mépyramine (Urquhart et Mulli gan, 1965 ;Keller et Ogilvie, 1972), ou l'acide lysergique (Urquhart et Mulligan, 1965).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…The involvement of immediate hypersensitivity or of prostaglandins in the process of worm expulsion from the intestine has been a long-standing theme of immunoparasitology [8,II,[13][14][15][16][19][20][21], Of all the processes of worm eviction, RE is perhaps the most likely candidate for an immediate hypersen sitivity-mediated event. Rejection in RF.-primed rats begins within hours of worm invasion and the re sponse is largely completed in 8-12 h (fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three ma jor restrictions apply to the interpretation of experi ments where role is deduced from functional inhibi tion studies of any potential mediator. The first of these was discussed by Keller and Ogilvie [14] who cautioned against overinterpretation of data based on long-term administration of drugs with multiple phy siological effects. The second problem arises in deter mining whether the administered inhibitor has func tioned at the time and the site required to depress the parameter that is under investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%