1973
DOI: 10.2307/1127684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Early Stimulation on Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, preterms in intervention groups were more likely to perform cognitively at the level of term infants and/or maintain levels of performance over time, whereas preterm infants in control groups performed at less than standardized term levels or decreased performance over time (Barnard et al, 1987;Resnick et al, 1988;Scarr-Salapatek & Williams, 1973).…”
Section: Comments About Intervention Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, preterms in intervention groups were more likely to perform cognitively at the level of term infants and/or maintain levels of performance over time, whereas preterm infants in control groups performed at less than standardized term levels or decreased performance over time (Barnard et al, 1987;Resnick et al, 1988;Scarr-Salapatek & Williams, 1973).…”
Section: Comments About Intervention Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tested two different theoretically based interventions: one focused on helping parents assess developmental milestones and plan appropriate interventions, and the other was designed to help parents assess interaction patterns and plan a program to enhance mutuality in specific activities such as feeding and bedtime. Many intervention programs (Barnard et al, 1987;Brooten et al, 1986;Nurcombe et al, 1983;Resnick et al, 1987;Scarr-Salapatek & Williams, 1973) included components of all four foci. Although many of the studies referred to "parent" intervention, most of the interventions were primarily implemented with mothers as the recipients.…”
Section: Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, three studies were conceptualized at a broad level, but had few contacts and less than three significant results (Barnard et al, 1983;Siege1 et al, 1980;Wandersman, Wandersman, & Kahn, 1980). By contrast, four studies with a more limited focus on the family interaction, but that included 1 1 or more contacts showed more pervasive effects (Barrera, Rosenbaum, & Cunningham, 1986;Field, Widmayer, Stinger, & Ignatoff, 1980;Nurcombe, Howell, Rauh, Teti, Ruoff, Brennan, & Murphy, 1984;Scarr-Salapatek & Williams, 1973). Particularly informative in regard to the interrelation of the neediness of the population, the broad conceptualization of the intervention, and the effect of duration is the work of Kathryn Barnard and her colleagues.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By remaining in contact with the family after discharge, this professional will be available to refer families to appropriate community services and resources in a timely manner as needs develop after discharge. Most families welcome this support after discharge, as such services help to alleviate parent worries and result in better child functioning at the age of 1 year (Scarr-Salapatek & Williams, 1973) and more effective parent-child interaction at the age of 2 years (Bromwich & Parmelee, 1979).…”
Section: Making Decisions About Community-based Resources and Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%