2013
DOI: 10.1080/09599916.2012.762034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of eco-certification on office properties: a cap rates-based analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier studies note that beyond market fundamentals, commercial cap rates in general (Ghysels, Plazzi and Valkanov 2007) and hotel cap rates in particular (Das, 2015) are prone to socio-political differences which are not directly associated with risk-reward fundamentals. Other studies such as Lockwood and Rutherford (1996), Mcdonald and Dermisi (2008), Peng (2013), andMcGrath (2013) have shown an association between tangible attributes and cap rates: size (-ve), age (+ve), higher classification (-ve), access to amenities (-ve) and eco-labels (e.g. LEED or Energy Star).…”
Section: Sources Of Conspicuity Extreme Physical Attributesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Earlier studies note that beyond market fundamentals, commercial cap rates in general (Ghysels, Plazzi and Valkanov 2007) and hotel cap rates in particular (Das, 2015) are prone to socio-political differences which are not directly associated with risk-reward fundamentals. Other studies such as Lockwood and Rutherford (1996), Mcdonald and Dermisi (2008), Peng (2013), andMcGrath (2013) have shown an association between tangible attributes and cap rates: size (-ve), age (+ve), higher classification (-ve), access to amenities (-ve) and eco-labels (e.g. LEED or Energy Star).…”
Section: Sources Of Conspicuity Extreme Physical Attributesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Signaling theory (Atkinson and Rosenthal ) posits that an eco‐label from an independent third party signifies that “a product is produced in accordance with the standards” (Sonderskov and Daugbjerg , 508) and indicates a product and/or firm's eco‐friendliness. The use of eco‐labels across various industries, for example, building (McGrath ; Fuerst ), tourism (Buckley ; Ryglová ), fisheries (Khan ), food (Grolleau and Caswell ; Berghoef and Dodds ), and forestry (Blackman and Rivera ; Ibanez and Laye ), supports eco‐labels’ effectiveness. Therefore, we hypothesize that eco‐labels reduce the information gap, thereby increasing a consumer's WTP for a product that promises a better environmental footprint through the use of reused content.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Studies confirm lower cap rates in certified buildings. Miller, Spivey and Florance () found them to be 55 bps lower for LEED buildings, Pivo and Fisher () found them to be 52 bps lower for Energy Star buildings, and McGrath () found them to be 36 bps lower for a combined sample of LEED and Energy Star buildings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%