How do retinal images lead to perceived environmental objects? Vision involves a series of spatial and material transformations-from environmental objects to retinal images, to neurophysiological patterns, and finally to perceptual experience and action. A rationale for understanding functional relations among these physically different systems occurred to Gustav Fechner: Differences in sensation correspond to differences in physical stimulation. The concept of information is similar: Relationships in one system may correspond to, and thus represent, those in another. Criteria for identifying and evaluating information include (a)resolution, or the precision of correspondence; (b)uncertainty about which input (output) produced a given output (input); and (c)invariance, or the preservation of correspondence under transformations of input and output. We apply this framework to psychophysical evidence to identify visual information for perceiving surfaces. The elementary spatial structure shared by objects and images is the second-order differential structure of local surface shape. Experiments have shown that human vision is directly sensitive to this higher-order spatial information from interimage disparities (stereopsis and motion parallax), boundary contours, texture, shading, and combined variables. Psychophysical evidence contradicts other common ideas about retinal information for spatial vision and object perception. The fundamental problem of vision is to understand how retinal images lead to perceived environmental objects Spatial vision is so marvelously effective that usually it is taken for granted. We perceive environmental objects but not the visual instrument by which they are revealed. Spatial vision pervades our conscious experience, but our understanding of the underlying visual mechanisms has substantial gaps.Gaps in understanding occur especially at the interfaces between visual subsystems, where information is transferred from one physical and spatial format to another. How does vision transcend vast changes in format-involving 3-D objects and spaces, 2-D optical images, neural spike trains and synaptic interactions in multiple neural areas, conscious perceptions, and behavioral actions? How do immaterial knowledge and experience arise from material objects and events? The present article offers a theoretical framework for addressing these issues-based on the concept of information, involving corresponding relational structures in physically separate domains. We describe criteria for identifying and evaluating structural correspondence and then apply these criteria to research on shape perception.
Fechner' s insightIn the 19th century, Gustav Fechner struggled for years to find a scientific rationale for linking the material and mental worlds. Material objects have mass and spatial extent, but mental experience has neither. Some have concluded that mental events belong to a spiritual world. Fechner, however, believed that mind and body are inseparable and that mental events are emerg...