2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) collars on cattle ( Bos taurus) behaviour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Refer to Table 1 in Manning et al [16] for a list of observed behaviours and observation schedule. Peak grazing times were determined for the GNSS collar period (Days 6-10), based on the behavioural observation data when grazing was accounted for ≥50% of recorded behaviours per hour for the herd.…”
Section: Behaviour Observations and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Refer to Table 1 in Manning et al [16] for a list of observed behaviours and observation schedule. Peak grazing times were determined for the GNSS collar period (Days 6-10), based on the behavioural observation data when grazing was accounted for ≥50% of recorded behaviours per hour for the herd.…”
Section: Behaviour Observations and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the morning of Day 11, cattle were again brought back into the yards and the collars removed before the cows were returned to the same paddock for a further five days. No significant behavioural effects of cattle wearing a GNSS collar were found, nor was a habituation period required [16]. The GNSS collars received a positional fix every 10 s using the Navstar Global Positioning System, enabling the investigation of paddock utilisation by cattle over the five days (Days 6-10) collars were worn (GNSS collar period).…”
Section: Gnss Collar Deployment and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Collars were mounted on the 26 chosen animals at 5:00 p.m. on 30 April 2018 and removed 5 days later at the same time, which corresponds to both the duration of the complete grazing rotation and the autonomy of the sensor battery. It should be noted that a period of habituation to the device by the cows was not necessary as the complete device represented approximately 0.1% of the animal’s weight [ 16 ]. The data collected from 21:00 h to 05:00 h were not used in this study to focus on the daytime behavior exclusively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the state of the art work, some of the most relevant studies apply AmI to the following fields: Monitoring the position of the animal and analysis of the behavior of the herd : By monitoring the position of livestock, it is possible to study the behavior of both individual animals and the herd as a whole. Since it may be argued that wearable technology annoys animals and alters their habitual behavior, studies that deny this theory have been carried out [ 14 ]. Wearable technology designed for animals usually takes the form of necklaces that make use of GPS, although there are also devices that make use of other technologies such as ZigBee [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%