2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-010-1814-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of habitat connectivity and regional heterogeneity on artificial pond metacommunities

Abstract: Habitat connectivity and regional heterogeneity represent two factors likely to affect biodiversity across different spatial scales. We performed a 3 × 2 factorial design experiment to investigate the effects of connectivity, heterogeneity, and their interaction on artificial pond communities of freshwater invertebrates at the local (α), among-community (β), and regional (γ) scales. Despite expectations that the effects of connectivity would depend on levels of regional heterogeneity, no significant interactio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While dispersal does not necessarily affect diversity at the local or regional scale in heterogeneous metacommunities, it usually tends to homogenize communities and thus decreases beta diversity [30,49]. However, we did not find a significant effect of dispersal on beta diversity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…While dispersal does not necessarily affect diversity at the local or regional scale in heterogeneous metacommunities, it usually tends to homogenize communities and thus decreases beta diversity [30,49]. However, we did not find a significant effect of dispersal on beta diversity.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…However, cattle tank communities in study 2 had lower proportions of littoral species than the George Lake community (B. Walseng unpublished data; Schartau et al 2007). This could be due to an inability of some littoral species to survive in cattle tanks without macrophytes or sediment that provide necessary habitat structures (DeClerck et al 2007), although Pedruski and Arnott (2011) found that substrate had no significant effect on local zooplankton richness in cattle tanks identical to the ones used in this study. It could also be due to the effects of unintentionally introduced aerial colonizers.…”
Section: Consequences Of Canoe-mediated Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Declining beta-diversity with increasing dispersal frequency indicated homogenization of the metacommunity, but competitive interactions were apparently not strong enough to exclude the same species from every local community. Likewise, metacommunity experiments with spatial heterogeneity in environmental conditions do not necessarily find an effect of connectivity on regional richness [26], [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%