2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of hitchhiker antigens co-eluting with affinity-purified research antibodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contaminant-IgG association under physiological conditions is routine with anti-chromatin antibodies because chromatin structure is so highly conserved across phyla. Monoclonal antibodies specific for chromatin from one species bind host chromatin expelled from dead host cells during cell culture production [21][22][23]. Lacking specialized purification procedures to dissociate the wrong-species antigen from the antibodies, they cause immunopotency for their authentic-species antigen to vary from lot to lot by up to a factor of 12 [23].…”
Section: Amplification Of Host Contamination By Igg-chromatin Interacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contaminant-IgG association under physiological conditions is routine with anti-chromatin antibodies because chromatin structure is so highly conserved across phyla. Monoclonal antibodies specific for chromatin from one species bind host chromatin expelled from dead host cells during cell culture production [21][22][23]. Lacking specialized purification procedures to dissociate the wrong-species antigen from the antibodies, they cause immunopotency for their authentic-species antigen to vary from lot to lot by up to a factor of 12 [23].…”
Section: Amplification Of Host Contamination By Igg-chromatin Interacmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementary to these approaches in upstream processing is the effort toward improving the downstream capture of HCPs by developing robust purification processes that are tolerant to the inherent variability in cell culture. In this regard, much attention has recently been focused on “problematic” HCPs, that is, proteins that (a) co‐elute with mAbs at the Protein A capture step (Gagnon et al, ; Gan et al, ; Hogwood, Tait, Koloteva‐Levine, Bracewell, & Smales, ; Zhang et al, ) or associate with most mAbs (Aboulaich et al, ; Gagnon et al, ; Levy, Valente, Choe, Lee, & Lenhoff, ; Mechetner, Sood, Nguyen, Gagnon, & Parseghian, ), (b) cause degradation of the product of interest through enzymatic digestion (Bee et al, ) or degradation of the excipients during storage (Chiu et al, ), or (c) present high immunogenicity risk at trace concentrations (Bailey‐Kellogg et al, ). It is important to accurately monitor the residual levels of these HCPs through the various stages of upstream and downstream processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study focuses on problematic HCPs in three primary categories based on risk factors described above: (a) HCPs co‐eluting with mAbs in the capture step, herein referred to as Group I (Aboulaich et al, ; Gagnon et al, ; Levy et al, ; Mechetner et al, ; Zhang et al, ), including IgG‐associated and Protein A‐binding HCPs, (b) HCPs that cause product degradation, or Group II (Aboulaich et al, ; Bee et al, ; Chiu et al, ; Goey et al, ; Zhang et al, ), and (c) HCPs with high immunogenicity risk, or Group III (Bailey‐Kellogg et al, ; Fischer et al, ; Goey et al, ; Jawa et al, ). In typical mAb platform processes, the large majority of HCPs are removed at the product capture step with Protein A‐based adsorbents; thus, the design of the subsequent intermediate and final polishing steps is highly dependent on their ability to remove the species that co‐elute with IgG from Protein A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations