2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6803.2011.01307.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Insider Trading Restrictions: Evidence From Historical Dividend Initiations and Omissions

Abstract: We investigate whether insider trading restrictions had their intended effects during the 1960s and 1970s. We examine insider trading and stock market behavior before dividend initiations and omissions announced between 1935 and 1974. Contrary to existing research and commentary, we show that restrictions had meaningful effects. During the 1960s and 1970s, insiders sold less frequently before dividend omissions, and the average profitability of insider trades declined. In addition, the positive (negative) stoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some other studies refer to insider trading to represent trading by insiders (mangers or directors). See Tanimura and Wehrly () for a review of regulations imposed on trading by insiders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other studies refer to insider trading to represent trading by insiders (mangers or directors). See Tanimura and Wehrly () for a review of regulations imposed on trading by insiders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…310 Tanimura recently found that the SEC's initial enforcement actions in the 1960s had meaningful effects in reducing insider trading volume and profitability. 311 Similarly, Piotroski and Roulstone found that enactment of ITSFEA and the earlier Insider Trading Sanctions Act (ITSA) reduced insider trading by deterring insiders from engaging in more blatant forms of the practice. 312 Grishenko and colleagues found less insider trading in countries that enforce insidertrading laws and provide better investor protection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%