2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2010.04.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of Japanese interventions on FX-forecast heterogeneity

Abstract: This paper investigates the determinants of forecast heterogeneity in the Yen-US dollar market using a panel data set from Consensus Economics. Regardless of the particular model specification and consideration of control variables we find that exchange rate misalignments increase forecast dispersion, while foreign exchange intervention of the Japanese Ministry of Finance dampens expectation heterogeneity.JEL classification: F31, D84, C33

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Market intervention reduces the incentives of the forecasters to extremely overpredict the forecast. This finding is consistent with the finding of Reitz et al (2010). Furthermore, this study provides evidence that forecasters' behaviors do not differ by their characteristics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Market intervention reduces the incentives of the forecasters to extremely overpredict the forecast. This finding is consistent with the finding of Reitz et al (2010). Furthermore, this study provides evidence that forecasters' behaviors do not differ by their characteristics.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Beine, Bènassy-Quéré, and MacDonald (2007) found that interventions had no impact on forecast heterogeneity between 1992 and 1994, while the impacts between 1996 and 2001 were statistically significant but ambiguously signed. Reitz, Stadtmann, and Taylor (2010) extended the sample period to the end of 2007, to consider the intervention that took place between 2002 and 2004, and they found that the interventions reduced expectation heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MacDonald and Marsh, 1996;Benassy-Quere et al, 2003;Reitz et al, 2010). Note: J (0.5) denotes the J-test for a symmetric loss function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamentalists’ behaviour tends to stabilise the market, while the presence of chartists may cause destabilisation. In contrast to these last findings, Reitz, Stadtmann and Taylor (2010), using panel data provided by Consensus Economics, showed that the Bank of Japan's interventions reduce dispersion among foreign exchange forecasts.…”
Section: Literature and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 68%