The Effects of Length and Orientation on Numerical Representation in Flow Maps

Abstract

Flow maps are a common type of geographic information visualization in which lines that symbolize flow are typically varied in width to represent differences in the magnitude of the flow. An accurate perception of thickness is critical to numerical representation in flow maps. Previous studies have identified some of the factors, such as horizontal–vertical visual illusions and color size effects, that affect the perceived size of objects. However, the question of whether multiple visual variables that encode flow lines, such as length, orientation, and shape, interfere with their perceived thicknesses, remains unanswered. In this study, we performed a user study to determine the effect of length and orientation on thickness perception. The result indicates that the horizontal orientation is perceived to be thicker than the vertical orientation, and a short length is perceived to be thicker than a long length. Furthermore, we report and discuss other results (e.g., on adjustment direction) that are consistent with previous work. Although this study constitutes basic research, accumulating evidence on thickness perception is essential to this field of science. This study may contribute to our understanding of the factors that influence the perception of the thickness of lines on a flow map. We provide some concrete guidelines for the design of flow maps that may be beneficial to map designers.

Incidental graphical perception: How marks and display time influence accuracy

“…Graphical Perception studies are usually conducted using psychophysics techniques or specific visual tasks to test the accuracy of different visual encodings. 27,28 In both, the most common one is using comparison 29,30 via magnitude estimation and magnitude production. Magnitude estimation is a task in which people estimate the proportion of one element relative to another.…”

Numbers on Thematic Maps: Helpful Simplicity or Too Raw to Be Useful for Map Reading?

“…Such maps are significantly simplified in terms of their visual complexity, but it is not clear to what extent such an approach is favourable and preferred by users. User studies are a common approach to verifying the usability of and possible challenges with maps (e.g., [2][3][4]) and geovisualisations [5,6]. However, despite their frequent use, quantitative thematic maps have not been a common subject of extensive empirical research [7].…”