2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra06169a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of LiTi2(PO4)3modification on the performance of spherical Li1.5Ni0.25Mn0.75O2+δcathode material

Abstract: Effect of LiTi2(PO4)3 coating on the electrochemical properties of spherical layered Li1.5Ni0.25Mn0.75O2+δ cathode material.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure e presents the CV of the LNCM-O sample at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s –1 in a voltage range of 2–4.6 V. It can be apparently found that the peaks of CV curves are completely consistent with charge/discharge profiles. The anodic peak at ∼4.0 V is assigned primarily to the oxidation of Ni 2+ /Co 3+ to Ni 4+ /Co 4+ , meanwhile, the strong anodic peak around 4.6 V is principally associated with the extraction of Li + from Li 2 MnO 3 component accompanying with the extraction of oxygen and structural rearrangement. Besides, the followed curves were overlapped well with each other, confirming that LNCM-O sample exhibits an eminent structural reversibility and good cycle performance.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Figure e presents the CV of the LNCM-O sample at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s –1 in a voltage range of 2–4.6 V. It can be apparently found that the peaks of CV curves are completely consistent with charge/discharge profiles. The anodic peak at ∼4.0 V is assigned primarily to the oxidation of Ni 2+ /Co 3+ to Ni 4+ /Co 4+ , meanwhile, the strong anodic peak around 4.6 V is principally associated with the extraction of Li + from Li 2 MnO 3 component accompanying with the extraction of oxygen and structural rearrangement. Besides, the followed curves were overlapped well with each other, confirming that LNCM-O sample exhibits an eminent structural reversibility and good cycle performance.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Notably, after this round of screening, the polyanionic oxides (109) outnumber the non-polyanionic oxides (31) because of their higher pass rates (26.5% for polyanionic oxides versus 7.8% for non-polyanionic oxides). It is worth noting that several polyanionic oxide coatings that have been used in cells with liquid electrolyte have oxidation limits exceeding our threshold (e.g., LiCoPO 4 (4.19 eV), 57,58 LiNiPO 4 (4.22 eV), and 59 LiTi 2 (PO 4 ) 3 (4.59 eV) 60 ), explaining their reported good performance. The pass rate is 12.9% for oxyfluorides, which is in between the numbers for polyanionic oxides and non-polyanionic oxides.…”
Section: Electrochemical Stability Screeningmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Indeed, when charged to 4.6 V, LiTi 2 (PO 4 ) 3 coating enhanced the capacity retention and rate capacity of a Li 1.5 Ni 0.25 Mn 0.75 O 2+d cathode in a conventional Li-ion battery. 60 Challenges with the Current Coating Strategy Beyond the screening requirements used in this work, there are many other challenges associated with designing an optimal cathode composite. For example, the formation of electronically conductive interphase products at the coating/electrolyte interface would make the coating a mixed conductor and compromise its functionality.…”
Section: Trade-off Between Ionic Conductivity and Oxidation Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can provide much higher reversible capacity (250-300 mAh g -1 ) and operating voltage (>4.6 V vs. Li + /Li) than the traditional cathode materials such as LiCoO2, spinel LiMn2O4 and olivine LiFePO4, because of its particular crystal structure. In the recent years, the studies on the relationship between structure and electrochemical performance of LLO material have been widely reported [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. However, the studies for the structure of LLO materials and effect of the structure on their electrochemical performance still remain controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%