The Effects of Loading Time on Osseointegration and New Bone Formation Around Dental Implants: A Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in Dogs

Ghanavati, Farzin; Shayegh, Sayed Shojaedin; Rahimi, Hessam; Sharifi, Davood; Ghanavati, Farzam; Khalesseh, Niloofar; Eslami, Bita

doi:10.1902/jop.2006.050436

Cited by 27 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Similar results have also been reported by Ghanavati [16], Steflik et al [33], and Testori et al [34]. Mechanical loading plays an important role in the preservation and maintenance of human skeleton.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Comparative Evaluation of Two Types of Immediately Loaded Implants Using Biomechanical and Histomorphometric Tests: An Animal Case Study

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. In order to minimize the required time to regain esthetic and function, immediately loaded implants were suggested. The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the Nisastan and XIve implants using biomechanical and histomorphometric tests. Materials and Methods. In this experimental study, 6 Nisastan one-piece immediately loaded screw type implant (OPILS) and 6 Xive implants with 3.4 mm diameter and 11 mm long were used. The implants were immediately loaded with temporary coating. After three months, the torque required to break bone-implant contact was measured and was recorded. All implants were extracted with surrounding bone and histologically were evaluated. The data were inputted into the SPSS 11.5 to run student T-test statistical analyses (α = 0.05). Results. The success rates of both types of implants was 100%, and none of them failed due to mobility or bone loss. The mean removal torque value (RTV) was 142.08 and 40 N/Cm for Xive and Nisastan implants, respectively, and their RTVs showed a significant difference between two mentioned implants (P = 0.004). None of the histomorphometric values showed significant differences between the two implants (P > 0.05). Discussion. both systems have the capability to induce osseointegration under immediate loads but that Xive implants showed higher capability for bone contact.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Comparative Evaluation of Two Types of Immediately Loaded Implants Using Biomechanical and Histomorphometric Tests: An Animal Case Study

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of the present study could be explained by Degidi and Piattelli [32], Calandriello et al [33], Romanos et al [34] and Ghanavati et al [35] who found that immediately loaded implants' micromovements can improve osseointegration and can dramatically increase the bone density. Also it was shown that immediate loads can increase the mineralization rate in bone-implant interface.…”

supporting

confidence: 71%

Radiographic Bone Changes Around Immediately Placed Immediately Restored Dental Implants In Periodontally Compromised Sites

Elamrousy¹,

Nassar²,

ragheb³

et al. 2013

Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[23] Rismanchian et al ., who placed 12 implants in mandibles of 3 dogs followed by immediate loading, demonstrated that no difference exists between osseointegration of loaded and unloaded implants and that formation of lamellar and WB is the same in both groups. [24]…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of orthodontic immediate force on dental implants: Histomorphologic and histomorphometric assessment

Rismanchian

Raji

Razavi

et al. 2017

Ann Maxillofac Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Effects of Loading Time on Osseointegration and New Bone Formation Around Dental Implants: A Histologic and Histomorphometric Study in Dogs

Abstract: Loading time does not seem to significantly affect the degree of osseointegration and bone-to-implant contact and the composition of newly formed bone around dental implants.

Cited by 27 publications

References 34 publications

Comparative Evaluation of Two Types of Immediately Loaded Implants Using Biomechanical and Histomorphometric Tests: An Animal Case Study

Comparative Evaluation of Two Types of Immediately Loaded Implants Using Biomechanical and Histomorphometric Tests: An Animal Case Study

Radiographic Bone Changes Around Immediately Placed Immediately Restored Dental Implants In Periodontally Compromised Sites

Application of orthodontic immediate force on dental implants: Histomorphologic and histomorphometric assessment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About