The effects of locus of control on university students’ mobile learning adoption

Mobile Learning Application Development Fostering High Order Thinking Skills on Physics Learning

“…Many educational institutions have provided some alternative models of learning activities to learners. The goal is that the learners can flexibly manage learning activities in accordance with their available time and daily activities [13] [14]. Mobile learning facilitates interaction between learners with the subject matter, between learners and teachers or even between fellow learners by sharing information or opinions about various matters that relates the lessons or self-development needs, regarding the learners" learning [15] …”

The Relationship between Individual Innovativeness and Locus of Control: A Research on Tourism Faculty Students

“…According to the literature review, there are researches to determine relationship between technology application and locus of control (LOC) are; Coovert & Goldstein (1980), Kay (1990), Hoffman, Novak & Schlosser (2003), Chak (2003), Hsia, Chang & Tseng (2014), Hsia (2016). Researches to determine relationship between LOC and innovativeness are more restricted; Mueller & Thomas (2001), Tabak Erkuş & Meydan (2010, Türker & İnel (2012), Engle, Mah &Sadri (2014).…”

LEGO Robotik Öğretim Uygulamalarının Kabulü Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışmaları

“…The results of such examination point out to the technology acceptance model. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is a quite widely used technological model (Hsia, 2016). The TAM is aimed to determine individuals' levels of acceptance of the relevant technology on basis of the criteria 'perceived ease of use' and 'perceived usefulness' (Teo, 2010;Davis, 1989); perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness are addressed as the primary markers of the TAM (Khee, Wei and Jamaluddin, 2014;Davis, 1989).…”

“…Perceived usefulness is referred to as the opinion that the individual's own work/effort/skill, etc. performance will be improved in frame of the relevant topic after using the relevant technology; while perceived ease of use is referred to as the opinion that the individual can use the relevant technology by spending very little effort (Hsia, 2016). It is stated under the model that an individual's perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness in respect of a technology have an effect on determining the attitude of such individual towards using the relevant technology; that the individual's attitude towards the use of technology directly influences, while perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness indirectly influences, such individual's intention to use technology (Dastjerdi, 2016).…”

“…Teknoloji kabul modeli (Technology Acceptance Model, TKM), teknolojileri yönelik olarak çok yaygın bir şekilde kullanılan bir modeldir (Hsia, 2016). TKM, bireylerin ilgili teknolojiyi kabul etme durumlarını algılanan kullanım kolaylığı ve algılanan fayda yapıları temelinde belirlemeyi amaçlamakta (Teo, 2010;Davis, 1989), algılanan kullanım kolaylığı ve algılanan fayda TKM'nin birincil belirleyicileri olarak belirtilmektedir (Khee, Wei ve Jamaluddin, 2014;Davis, 1989).…”