The effects of mobile health on emergency care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and narrative synthesis

Abstract

Background In resource-constrained settings, mobile health (mHealth) has varied applications. While there is strong evidence for its use in chronic disease management, the applications of mHealth for management of acute illness in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are not as well described. This review systematically explores current available evidence on the effectiveness of mHealth interventions at improving health outcomes in emergency care settings in LMICs. Methods A systematic search of the literature was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, utilizing seven electronic databases and manual searches to identify peer-reviewed literature containing each of three search elements: mHealth, emergency care (EC), and LMICs. Articles quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. Results After removing duplicates, 6498 studies met initial search criteria; 108 were eligible for full text review and 46 met criteria for inclusion. Thirty-six pertained to routine emergency care, and 10 involved complex humanitarian emergencies. Based on the GRADE criteria, 15 studies were rated as “Very Low” quality, 24 as “Low” quality, 6 as “Moderate” quality, and 1 as “High” quality. Eight studied data collection, 9 studied decision support, 15 studied direct patient care, and 14 studied health training. All 46 studies reported positive impacts of mHealth on EC in LMICs. Conclusions Mobile health interventions can be effective in improving provider-focused and patient-centered outcomes in both routine and complex EC settings. Future investigations focusing on patient-centered outcomes are needed to further validate these findings.

Global emergency medicine: A scoping review of the literature from 2020

“…The GEMLR platform has been used to evaluate narrower topics in systematic reviews published elsewhere. [19][20][21][22] Recognizing that important clinical guidance is at times also found in non-peer-reviewed "gray" literature produced by various international organizations, 23 we also supplement the review of published literature with a manual search and review of new guidance found on the websites of several key organizations, including academic think thanks and prominent humanitarian governmental and nongovernmental organizations.…”

Global Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review of the Literature from 2022

“…A subgroup of the GEMLR team began publishing a systematic review to further highlight and synthesize areas of GEM research that have broad clinical relevance 20–23 . Its most recent publications highlighted interventions for patients with severe acute respiratory infections (including 34 of 58 articles focusing on COVID‐19) in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) 24,25 .…”

A novel smartphone app for blood pressure measurement: a proof-of-concept study against an arterial catheter

“…Mobile revolution applied to healthcare is a promising candidate to leverage out-of-office blood pressure monitoring as numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have enforced the effectiveness of mobile health to improved medical adherence by lowering both mortality and morbidity [8]. Hence, bringing to the populations a mobile application allowing them to measure accurately their blood pressure at any time would be an important step in the global health prevention strategy.…”